These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5322857)
1. A brief note on the comparison of two grapho-motor techniques in diagnosing brain damage. Wagner EE; Evans KA J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1966 Feb; 30(1):54. PubMed ID: 5322857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The application of graphical methods in the diagnosis of early infantile brain lesions]. Regel H; Parnitzke KH; Fischel W Acta Paedopsychiatr; 1965 Oct; 32(10):299-307 contd. PubMed ID: 5321345 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Differentiation of brain damage among low IQ subjects with three projective techniques. Wagner EE; Klein I; Walter T J Pers Assess; 1978 Feb; 42(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 342684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can projective test measures aid in the detection and differential diagnosis of reading deficit? Stavrianos BK J Pers Assess; 1971 Feb; 35(1):80-91. PubMed ID: 4950143 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Bender Gestalt test for both black and white brain-damaged patients using two scoring systems. Butler OT; Coursey RD; Gatz M J Consult Clin Psychol; 1976 Apr; 44(2):280-5. PubMed ID: 1254762 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Organicity as shown in Bender-gestalt test and the Wechsler Adult intelligence scale. Manavi E Acta Med Iran; 1975; 18(1-2):77-85. PubMed ID: 1225008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The possibility of overdiagnosing brain dysfunction from a single administration of the Bender Gestalt Test. Wetzel KH; Welcher DW; Mellits ED Johns Hopkins Med J; 1971 Jul; 129(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 4106577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of task-central and task-peripheral forms of the Canter-BIP in diagnosing brain damage in adults. Adams J Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Dec; 33(3):1259-67. PubMed ID: 5160043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the Bender Gestalt Test and Frostig Test in several clinical groups of children. Culbertson FM; Gunn RC J Clin Psychol; 1966 Oct; 22(4):439. PubMed ID: 5339182 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Simulation of brain damage on the Bender-Gestalt test by college subjects. Bruhn AR; Reed MR J Pers Assess; 1975 Jun; 39(3):244-55. PubMed ID: 1185494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relationship between rotations on the Bender-Gestalt test and ratings of patient disorientation. Mermelstein JJ J Pers Assess; 1983 Oct; 47(5):490-1. PubMed ID: 6644524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of scoring systems and level of scorer experience on the Bender-Gestalt Test. Lacks PB; Newport K J Pers Assess; 1980 Aug; 44(4):351-7. PubMed ID: 7411379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A CASE STUDY: EMOTIONAL FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO THE TEST PERFORMANCE AND BEHAVIOR OF A BRAIN-DAMAGED CHILD. FRIEDMAN G J Genet Psychol; 1965 Mar; 106():89-99. PubMed ID: 14273724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Bender-Gestalts of organic children: accuracy of clinical judgment. Wagner EE; Murray AY J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1969 Jun; 33(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 5784337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A procedural critique of "Bender Gestalts of organic children: accuracy of clinical judgment". Mordock JB J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1969 Dec; 33(6):489-92. PubMed ID: 5360509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The assessment of brain damage from a psychometric point of view. Schepers JM Forensic Sci; 1972 Sep; 1(3):269-311. PubMed ID: 4566609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Advancement along a complexity gradient in perceptual level and brain damage. Pelc RE Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Feb; 32(1):251-4. PubMed ID: 4926722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]