These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 533239)
21. Pulsatile ocular blood flow in patients with low tension glaucoma. James CB; Smith SE Br J Ophthalmol; 1991 Aug; 75(8):466-70. PubMed ID: 1873264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Considerations on anthropometric measurements of the female breast. Vandeput JJ; Nelissen M Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2002; 26(5):348-55. PubMed ID: 12432473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Changes in breast volume during normal menstrual cycle and after oral contraceptives. Milligan D; Drife JO; Short RV Br Med J; 1975 Nov; 4(5995):494-6. PubMed ID: 1192144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Measurement of breast volume using body scan technology(computer-aided anthropometry). Veitch D; Burford K; Dench P; Dean N; Griffin P Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():4038-45. PubMed ID: 22317340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of musculoskeletal development on the prediction of body density in females. Ellison JD; Christian VK; Johnson RL; Warren BJ; Collins MA J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 1992 Jun; 32(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 1434587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Reliability of body fat distribution measurements. The ARIC Study baseline cohort results. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Ferrario M; Carpenter MA; Chambless LE Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1995 Jul; 19(7):449-57. PubMed ID: 8520633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The relative body fat and anthropometric prediction of body density of South Australian females aged 17-35 years. Withers RT; Norton KI; Craig NP; Hartland MC; Venables W Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1987; 56(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 3569224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Accurate assessment of breast volume: a study comparing the volumetric gold standard (direct water displacement measurement of mastectomy specimen) with a 3D laser scanning technique. Yip JM; Mouratova N; Jeffery RM; Veitch DE; Woodman RJ; Dean NR Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Feb; 68(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 21587046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Estimation of breast volume and its variation during the menstrual cycle using MRI and stereology. Hussain Z; Roberts N; Whitehouse GH; García-Fiñana M; Percy D Br J Radiol; 1999 Mar; 72(855):236-45. PubMed ID: 10396212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Iowa anatomical position system. A method of assessing posture. Smidt GL; Day JW; Gerleman DG Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1984; 52(4):407-13. PubMed ID: 6540668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessment of adipose tissue distribution by computed axial tomography in obese women: association with body density and anthropometric measurements. Ferland M; Després JP; Tremblay A; Pinault S; Nadeau A; Moorjani S; Lupien PJ; Thériault G; Bouchard C Br J Nutr; 1989 Mar; 61(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 2706220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Personal best time and training volume, not anthropometry, is related to race performance in the 'Swiss Bike Masters' mountain bike ultramarathon. Knechtle B; Knechtle P; Rosemann T; Senn O J Strength Cond Res; 2011 May; 25(5):1312-7. PubMed ID: 21522074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The cost effectiveness of three different measures of breast volume. Caruso MK; Guillot TS; Nguyen T; Greenway FL Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2006; 30(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 16411159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Estimation of thigh muscle and adipose tissue volume using magnetic resonance imaging and anthropometry. Tothill P; Stewart AD J Sports Sci; 2002 Jul; 20(7):563-76. PubMed ID: 12166882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Resilience of anthropometric data assembly strategies to imposed error. Ward R; Anderson GS J Sports Sci; 1998 Nov; 16(8):755-9. PubMed ID: 10189081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Measurement protocol of women's nude breasts using a 3D scanning technique. Lee HY; Hong K; Kim EA Appl Ergon; 2004 Jul; 35(4):353-9. PubMed ID: 15159200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quantification of the postural and technical errors in asymptomatic adults using direct 3D whole body scan measurements of standing posture. Tomkinson GR; Shaw LG Gait Posture; 2013 Feb; 37(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 22824678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Random errors in anthropometry. Kouchi M; Mochimaru M; Tsuzuki K; Yokoi T J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1996 Dec; 25(2):155-66. PubMed ID: 9735595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Bra band size measurements derived from three-dimensional scans are not accurate in women with large, ptotic breasts. McGhee DE; Ramsay LG; Coltman CE; Gho SA; Steele JR Ergonomics; 2018 Mar; 61(3):464-472. PubMed ID: 28673203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of the anatomical parameters for normal tissue sparing in the prone position radiotherapy with small sized left breasts. Kim H; Kim J Oncotarget; 2016 Nov; 7(44):72211-72218. PubMed ID: 27756882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]