These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. INKBLOT PERCEPTION AND THE PROCESS-REACTIVE DISTINCTION. ULLMANN LP; ECK RA J Clin Psychol; 1965 Jul; 21():311-3. PubMed ID: 14332204 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The Holtzman Inkblot Technique and aging: norms and factor structure. Hayslip B J Pers Assess; 1982 Jun; 46(3):248-56. PubMed ID: 7108727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Performance of forensic patients on the Holtzman Inkblot Technique: a normative study. Mullen JM; Reinehr RC; Swartz JD Percept Mot Skills; 1982 Feb; 54(1):275-80. PubMed ID: 7063345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The Holtzman inkblot technique as a measure of perceptual development in mental retardation. Swartz JD; Cleland CC; Drew CJ; Witzke DB J Pers Assess; 1971 Aug; 35(4):320-5. PubMed ID: 5566747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Eye contact and the human movement inkblot response. Lefcourt HM; Telegdi MS; Willows D; Buckspan B J Soc Psychol; 1972 Dec; 88(2):303-4. PubMed ID: 4639491 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Some basic psychologic investigations relevant to schizophrenia. Piotrowski ZA Ment Hyg; 1966 Oct; 50(4):536-40. PubMed ID: 5338933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [Howard ink blot test]. SCHACHTER M Osp Psichiatr; 1955; 23(4):285-302. PubMed ID: 13335260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The relationship of reading improvement to scores on the Holtzman inkblot technique. Krippner S J Clin Psychol; 1967 Jan; 23(1):114-5. PubMed ID: 5340076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. FACTOR ANALYSIS OF OBJECTIVE INK BLOT TEST SCORES. BRIDGES CC Percept Mot Skills; 1964 Apr; 18():489-92. PubMed ID: 14166043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Problems of a new hospitalization law]. Schirmer S; Möbius P; Hinderer H Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1970 Jul; 64(13):652-8. PubMed ID: 5521308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Threat of shock, state anxiety, and the Holtzman inkblot technique. Iacino LW; Cook PE J Pers Assess; 1974 Oct; 38(5):450-8. PubMed ID: 4430977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Projective methodologies. Fisher S Annu Rev Psychol; 1967; 18():165-90. PubMed ID: 5333546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [The Holtzman ink blot technic; form, criticism and alternative]. van Riemsdijk J Ned Tijdschr Psychol; 1966 Mar; 21(3):153-68. PubMed ID: 5327245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Some age norms obtained for the Holtzman inkblot technique administered in a clinical setting. Morgan AB J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1968 Apr; 32(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 5656932 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Selective attention and social interest. Huber RJ; Forsyth GA J Individ Psychol; 1972 May; 28(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 4555892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Scores made by retarded readers on the Holtzman Inkblot Technique. Krippner S Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Dec; 33(3):1089-90. PubMed ID: 5160021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Test anxiety and performance on the Holtzman Inkblot Technique. Swartz JD; Swartz CJ J Clin Psychol; 1968 Oct; 24(4):463-7. PubMed ID: 5735104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]