These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5347013)

  • 21. A computer model of auditory efferent suppression: implications for the recognition of speech in noise.
    Brown GJ; Ferry RT; Meddis R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):943-54. PubMed ID: 20136217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Auditory-visual integration for speech by children with and without specific language impairment.
    Norrix LW; Plante E; Vance R; Boliek CA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Dec; 50(6):1639-51. PubMed ID: 18055778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Shifting attention between the ears.
    Treisman AM
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1971 May; 23(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 5559704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Disruption of order information by irrelevant items: a serial recognition paradigm.
    Gisselgård J; Uddén J; Ingvar M; Petersson KM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 Mar; 124(3):356-69. PubMed ID: 16777043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Contributions of oral and extraoral facial movement to visual and audiovisual speech perception.
    Thomas SM; Jordan TR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):873-88. PubMed ID: 15462626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sequential audiovisual interactions during speech perception: a whole-head MEG study.
    Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Menning H; Ackermann H
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(6):1342-54. PubMed ID: 17067640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Audiovisual asynchrony detection in human speech.
    Maier JX; Di Luca M; Noppeney U
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):245-56. PubMed ID: 20731507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Context effects in speech recognition of sentences].
    Züst HJ; Tschopp K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Apr; 74(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 7772229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sentence perception units and levels of syntactic structure.
    Carroll JM
    Percept Psychophys; 1978 Jun; 23(6):506-14. PubMed ID: 683834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Rhythmic units and syntactic units in production and perception.
    Lehiste I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1973 Nov; 54(5):1228-34. PubMed ID: 4765807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Computer recognition of connected speech.
    Reddy DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1967 Aug; 42(2):329-47. PubMed ID: 6075932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A computer model for the perception of syntactic structure.
    Thorne JP
    Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1968 Dec; 171(1024):377-86. PubMed ID: 4387412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Neurophysiological dynamics of phrase-structure building during sentence processing.
    Nelson MJ; El Karoui I; Giber K; Yang X; Cohen L; Koopman H; Cash SS; Naccache L; Hale JT; Pallier C; Dehaene S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 May; 114(18):E3669-E3678. PubMed ID: 28416691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Familiar units prevail over statistical cues in word segmentation.
    Poulin-Charronnat B; Perruchet P; Tillmann B; Peereman R
    Psychol Res; 2017 Sep; 81(5):990-1003. PubMed ID: 27580733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The grammar of visual narrative: Neural evidence for constituent structure in sequential image comprehension.
    Cohn N; Jackendoff R; Holcomb PJ; Kuperberg GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Nov; 64():63-70. PubMed ID: 25241329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of response requirements on the location of clicks superimposed on sentences.
    Seitz MR; Weber BA
    Mem Cognit; 1974 Jan; 2(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 24214697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The interaction of perceptual processes and ambiguous sentences.
    Bever TG; Garrett MF; Hurtig R
    Mem Cognit; 1973 Sep; 1(3):277-86. PubMed ID: 24214558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Some Effects of Perceptual Load on Spoken Text Comprehension.
    Brunner H; Pisoni DB
    J Verbal Learning Verbal Behav; 1982 Apr; 21(2):186-195. PubMed ID: 23687387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Click monitoring revisited: an on-line study of sentence comprehension.
    Cohen L; Mehler J
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Jan; 24(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 8822161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Significance of pauses for speech percetion.
    Reich SS
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1980 Jul; 9(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 7411488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.