These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5352845)

  • 1. Arousal of ingroup-outgroup bias by a chance win or loss.
    Rabbie JM; Horwitz M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1969 Nov; 13(3):269-77. PubMed ID: 5352845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of mortality salience on evaluation of ingroup and outgroup sources: the impact of pro- versus counterattitudinal positions.
    See YH; Petty RE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Mar; 32(3):405-16. PubMed ID: 16455866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Criticizing groups from the inside and the outside: an identity perspective on the intergroup sensitivity effect.
    Hornsey MJ; Imani A
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2004 Mar; 30(3):365-83. PubMed ID: 15030626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implicit ingroup metafavoritism: subtle preference for ingroup members displaying ingroup bias.
    Castelli L; Tomelleri S; Zogmaister C
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jun; 34(6):807-18. PubMed ID: 18359956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Corralling the ingroup: deviant derogation and perception of group variability.
    Hutchison P; Abrams D; De Moura GR
    J Soc Psychol; 2013; 153(3):334-50. PubMed ID: 23724703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Personality characteristics and level of genuineness in group interaction.
    Vraa CW; Gerszewski MC
    Psychol Rep; 1972 Oct; 31(2):383-6. PubMed ID: 5081326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Group norms, intergroup resource allocation, and social reasoning among children and adolescents.
    McGuire L; Manstead ASR; Rutland A
    Dev Psychol; 2017 Dec; 53(12):2333-2339. PubMed ID: 28933878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. We are the opposite of you! Mirroring of national, regional and ethnic stereotypes.
    Hřebíčková M; Graf S; Tegdes T; Brezina I
    J Soc Psychol; 2017; 157(6):703-719. PubMed ID: 28129071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Dynamics of Compensation: When Ingroup Favoritism Paves the Way for Outgroup Praise.
    Yzerbyt V; Cambon L
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 May; 43(5):587-600. PubMed ID: 28903634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can imagined intergroup contact change (internal) dialogues on differences between ingroup and outgroup?
    Puchalska-Wasyl MM
    Scand J Psychol; 2019 Apr; 60(2):181-188. PubMed ID: 30734305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A test of the extended intergroup contact hypothesis: the mediating role of intergroup anxiety, perceived ingroup and outgroup norms, and inclusion of the outgroup in the self.
    Turner RN; Hewstone M; Voci A; Vonofakou C
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Oct; 95(4):843-60. PubMed ID: 18808263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aging and ethnicity in healthy elderly women.
    Richek HG; Chuculate O; Klinert D
    Geriatrics; 1971 May; 26(5):146-52. PubMed ID: 5556472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 'They will not control us': Ingroup positivity and belief in intergroup conspiracies.
    Cichocka A; Marchlewska M; Golec de Zavala A; Olechowski M
    Br J Psychol; 2016 Aug; 107(3):556-76. PubMed ID: 26511288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why do people perceive ingroup homogeneity on ingroup traits and outgroup homogeneity on outgroup traits?
    Rubin M; Badea C
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2007 Jan; 33(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 17178928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Responding to deviance: target exclusion and differential devaluation.
    Eidelman S; Silvia PJ; Biernat M
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Sep; 32(9):1153-64. PubMed ID: 16902236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ingroup versus outgroup choices of strategy made by boys playing a non-zero-sum game.
    Wilson W; Rickard HC
    Psychol Rep; 1968 Apr; 22(2):555-62. PubMed ID: 5650252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Competitive victimhood as a response to accusations of ingroup harm doing.
    Sullivan D; Landau MJ; Branscombe NR; Rothschild ZK
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2012 Apr; 102(4):778-95. PubMed ID: 22229457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Taking Seriously Ingroup Self-Evaluation, Meta-Prejudice, and Prejudice in Analyzing Interreligious Relations.
    Putra IE
    Span J Psychol; 2016 Jul; 19():E46. PubMed ID: 27426239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Attraction and accuracy of perception in dyads.
    Brewer RE; Brewer MB
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1968 Feb; 8(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 5644480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. My enemy's enemy is my friend.
    Aronson E; Cope V
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1968 Jan; 8(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 5638028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.