These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 535442)

  • 1. Development of spatial representations: role of task demands and familiarity with the environment.
    Cohen R; Weatherford DL; Lomenick T; Koeller K
    Child Dev; 1979 Dec; 50(4):1257-60. PubMed ID: 535442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of barriers on spatial representations.
    Cohen R; Weatherford DL
    Child Dev; 1981 Sep; 52(3):1087-90. PubMed ID: 7285648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of spatial separation of stimuli on children's discrimination learning.
    Etaugh CF; Pope BK
    Child Dev; 1974 Dec; 45(4):1170-2. PubMed ID: 4143875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Viewpoint dependency in the recognition of dynamic scenes.
    Garsoffky B; Schwan S; Hesse FW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1035-50. PubMed ID: 12450330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developing symbolic capacity one step at a time.
    Huttenlocher J; Vasilyeva M; Newcombe N; Duffy S
    Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 17280658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early development of scaling ability.
    Vasilyeva M; Huttenlocher J
    Dev Psychol; 2004 Sep; 40(5):682-90. PubMed ID: 15355158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive maps in children and men.
    Kosslyn SM; Pick HL; Fariello GR
    Child Dev; 1974 Sep; 45(3):707-16. PubMed ID: 4143827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Studies of the cognitive representation of spatial relations: II. A familiar environment.
    Baird JC; Merrill AA; Tannenbaum J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1979 Mar; 108(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 528900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Symmetry and asymmetry of human spatial memory.
    McNamara TP; Diwadkar VA
    Cogn Psychol; 1997 Nov; 34(2):160-90. PubMed ID: 9398395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial knowledge acquisition from direct experience in the environment: individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places.
    Ishikawa T; Montello DR
    Cogn Psychol; 2006 Mar; 52(2):93-129. PubMed ID: 16375882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intertask correspondence in the five to seven shift: transposition, cue interference, and spatial memory.
    Corsini DA; Berg AJ
    Child Dev; 1973 Sep; 44(3):467-75. PubMed ID: 4730532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extended experience benefits spatial mental model development with route but not survey descriptions.
    Brunyé TT; Taylor HA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):340-54. PubMed ID: 17723221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of pre-exposure to the same or different pattern of extra-maze cues on subsequent extra-maze discrimination.
    Rodrigo T; Chamizo VD; McLaren IP; Mackintosh NJ
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1994 Feb; 47(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 8165323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. NMDA antagonist MK-801 does not interfere with the use of spatial representation in a familiar environment.
    Uekita T; Okaichi H
    Behav Neurosci; 2005 Apr; 119(2):548-56. PubMed ID: 15839801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Object-position binding in visual memory for natural scenes and object arrays.
    Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Feb; 33(1):31-47. PubMed ID: 17311477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Genetic study of systems of spatial reference using eye movements and 2 memorization tasks].
    Baudonnière PM; Pêcheux MG; Taranne P
    Annee Psychol; 1981; 81(2):329-46. PubMed ID: 7337428
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selective reaching: evidence for multiple frames of reference.
    Keulen RF; Adam JJ; Fischer MH; Kuipers H; Jolles J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2002 Jun; 28(3):515-26. PubMed ID: 12075885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Language within your reach: near-far perceptual space and spatial demonstratives.
    Coventry KR; Valdés B; Castillo A; Guijarro-Fuentes P
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):889-95. PubMed ID: 18706538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distance cognition in virtual environmental space: further investigations to clarify the route-angularity effect.
    Jansen-Osmann P; Wiedenbauer G
    Psychol Res; 2006 Jan; 70(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 15309533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatial association learning by rufous hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus): effects of relative spacing among stimuli.
    Brown GS
    J Comp Psychol; 1994 Mar; 108(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 8174343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.