These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5355044)

  • 1. Mood as a confounding variable in eye dominance, field dependence and reading.
    Nadien M; Schaeffer DS; Schmeidler GR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1969 Aug; 29(1):277-8. PubMed ID: 5355044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does cerebral dominance offer a sufficient explanation for laterality differences in tachistoscopic recognition?
    White MJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Apr; 36(2):479-85. PubMed ID: 4690737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hemifield differences in binocular fusion.
    Carmon A; Nachshon I
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Feb; 36(1):175-84. PubMed ID: 4686707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Haidinger's brushes phenomenon for control of eye-fixation in a laterality experiment.
    Yamada K; Sugano L
    Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Aug; 67(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 3211696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laterality and reading proficiency.
    Marcel T; Katz L; Smith M
    Neuropsychologia; 1974 Jan; 12(1):131-9. PubMed ID: 4821184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Dominance of a hemisphere and optical perception with tachistoscope examination].
    Deegener G
    Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1974 Apr; 26(4):193-201. PubMed ID: 4848523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perceptual interactions between bilaterally presented words: what you get is often not what you see.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychology; 2003 Oct; 17(4):566-77. PubMed ID: 14599270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ocular dominance affects magnitude of dipole moment: an MEG study.
    Shima H; Hasegawa M; Tachibana O; Nomura M; Yamashita J; Ozaki Y; Kawai J; Higuchi M; Kado H
    Neuroreport; 2010 Aug; 21(12):817-21. PubMed ID: 20613677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential recognition of tachistoscopically presented English and Hebrew words in right and left visual fields.
    Barton MI; Goodglass H; Shai A
    Percept Mot Skills; 1965 Oct; 21(2):431-7. PubMed ID: 5848913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hemispheric processing characteristics for lexical decisions in adults with reading disorders.
    Walker MM; Spires H; Rastatter MP
    Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Feb; 92(1):273-87. PubMed ID: 11322595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of eye dominance on the apparent centers of simple horizontal lines.
    Mefferd RB; Wieland BA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1969 Jun; 28(3):847-50. PubMed ID: 5808977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonverbal fixation control in young children induces a left-field advantage in digit recall.
    Kershner J; Thomae R; Callaway R
    Neuropsychologia; 1977; 15(4-5):569-76. PubMed ID: 896013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eye movements in reading and information processing.
    Rayner K
    Psychol Bull; 1978 May; 85(3):618-60. PubMed ID: 353867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual perception.
    Haber RN
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1978; 29():31-59. PubMed ID: 341783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Lateralization of visual perception of letters during reverse masking].
    Miamlin VV
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1985; 35(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 4024730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual-field asymmetries in letter recognition: evidence for asymmetry in early visual registration.
    Pitblado C; Petrides M; Riccio G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Aug; 49(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 503735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
    Jordan TR; Paterson KB; Stachurski M
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acuity, crowding, reading and fixation stability.
    Falkenberg HK; Rubin GS; Bex PJ
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan; 47(1):126-35. PubMed ID: 17078991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Are hemianopic reading and visual exploration impairments visually elicited? New insights from eye movements in simulated hemianopia.
    Schuett S; Kentridge RW; Zihl J; Heywood CA
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):733-46. PubMed ID: 19121328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.