These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5359230)

  • 1. Commitment and expeience as determinants of assimilation and contrast.
    Thibaut J; Ross M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1969 Dec; 13(4):322-9. PubMed ID: 5359230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SIMILARITY IN STIMULUS MATERIAL AND STIMULUS TASK ON THE FORMATION OF A NEW SCALE OF JUDGMENT.
    TRESSELT ME
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Mar; 69():241-5. PubMed ID: 14271325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction outcome, S-R compatibility, and choice reaction time.
    Whitman CP; Geller ES
    J Exp Psychol; 1971 Dec; 91(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 5134673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An analysis of diagnostic reasoning. II. The strategy of intermediate decisions.
    Feinstein AR
    Yale J Biol Med; 1973 Oct; 46(4):264-83. PubMed ID: 4775683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fitting a psychometric function to price judgments: an analysis of consumers' discounted prices.
    Fan L; Takemura K
    Percept Mot Skills; 2005 Aug; 101(1):223-8. PubMed ID: 16350628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How might the discrepancy in the effects of perceptual variables on numerosity judgment be reconciled?
    Tokita M; Ishiguchi A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1839-53. PubMed ID: 20952782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When tolerance leads to intolerance: accessibility effects on social judgment.
    Araya T; Ekehammar B
    Scand J Psychol; 2009 Aug; 50(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 19392948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of anchoring and adjustment in the evaluation of product pricing.
    Elaad E; Sayag N; Ezer A
    Psychol Rep; 2010 Aug; 107(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 20923048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cue abstraction and exemplar memory in categorization.
    Juslin P; Jones S; Olsson H; Winman A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):924-41. PubMed ID: 14516225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Framing discrimination: effects of inclusion versus exclusion mind-sets on stereotypic judgments.
    Hugenberg K; Bodenhausen GV; McLain M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Dec; 91(6):1020-31. PubMed ID: 17144762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Need for cognition can magnify or attenuate priming effects in social judgment.
    Petty RE; DeMarree KG; Briñol P; Horcajo J; Strathman AJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jul; 34(7):900-12. PubMed ID: 18463396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Judgment and decision making.
    Mellers BA; Schwartz A; Cooke AD
    Annu Rev Psychol; 1998; 49():447-77. PubMed ID: 9496629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Zen and the art of clinical judgment.
    Casamassimo PS
    Pediatr Dent; 1992; 14(4):222-3. PubMed ID: 1303519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An interpretive study describing the clinical judgment of nurse practitioners.
    Brykczynski KA
    Sch Inq Nurs Pract; 1989; 3(2):75-104. PubMed ID: 2772457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Problems for judgment and decision making.
    Hastie R
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2001; 52():653-83. PubMed ID: 11148321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age differences in the correction processes of context-induced biases: when correction succeeds.
    Wang M; Chen Y
    Psychol Aging; 2004 Sep; 19(3):536-40. PubMed ID: 15383003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the significance of judgment studies.
    Christensen-Szalanski JJ; Fobian CS
    Med Decis Making; 1988; 8(4):265-7. PubMed ID: 3185179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two processes of conformity demonstrated by interactions of commitment, set, and personality.
    Sistrunk F
    J Soc Psychol; 1973 Feb; 89(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 4694581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating stimuli from contrasting categories: truncation due to boundaries.
    Huttenlocher J; Hedges LV; Lourenco SF; Crawford LE; Corrigan B
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Aug; 136(3):502-19. PubMed ID: 17696696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cultural differences in expectations of change and tolerance for contradiction: a decade of empirical research.
    Spencer-Rodgers J; Williams MJ; Kaiping Peng
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2010 Aug; 14(3):296-312. PubMed ID: 20435801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.