These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 536080)

  • 41. Early natural auditory-verbal education of children with profound hearing impairments in the Federal Republic of Germany: results of a 4 year study.
    Diller G; Graser P; Schmalbrock C
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2001 Sep; 60(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 11551613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Influence of communication mode on speech intelligibility and syntactic structure of sentences in profoundly hearing impaired French children implanted between 5 and 9 years of age.
    Vieu A; Mondain M; Blanchard K; Sillon M; Reuillard-Artieres F; Tobey E; Uziel A; Piron JP
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 1998 Jun; 44(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 9720675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Falling in with the big bad wolf, the usefulness of speaking without saying anything].
    Fourmond G
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1988; 109(4):321-3. PubMed ID: 3238193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Phoniatric aspects in the rehabilitation of patients with cochlear implants].
    Lamprecht A
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1986 Aug; 65(8):445-9. PubMed ID: 3762278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Speech modification by a deaf child through dynamic orometric modeling and feedback.
    Fletcher SG; Hasegawa A
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1983 May; 48(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 6621010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Visual intelligibility of consonants: a lipreading screening test with implications for aural rehabilitation.
    Binnie CA; Jackson PL; Montgomery AA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1976 Nov; 41(4):530-9. PubMed ID: 994484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The use of visual and tactile sensory aids in speech production training: a preliminary report.
    McGarr NS; Head J; Friedman M; Behrman AM; Youdelman K
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jan; 23(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 2420983
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. How well can children recognize speech features in spectrograms? Comparisons by age and hearing status.
    Ertmer DJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Jun; 47(3):484-95. PubMed ID: 15212563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Speech and hearing services in Malaysia.
    Curtis NW
    ASHA; 1973 Nov; 15(11):645-6. PubMed ID: 4757313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Problems of residual hearing in deaf and speech-disturbed children from the viewpoint of speech rehabilitation].
    Eguchi S; Tsuru M; Ogata K
    Jibiinkoka; 1966 Apr; 38(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 6006469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Speech perception improvement in children with cochlear implant.
    Manouchehri N; Adel-Ghahraman M; Mobedshahi F; Motesadi-Zarandi M
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2010 Jun; 11 Suppl 1():336-9. PubMed ID: 21756644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Auditory, visual, and auditory-visual recognition of consonants by children with normal and impaired hearing.
    Erber NP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1972 Jun; 15(2):413-22. PubMed ID: 5047880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Aural rehabilitation for a population of hearing impaired adults.
    Curry ET
    Eye Ear Nose Throat Mon; 1970 Apr; 49(4):182-5. PubMed ID: 5481603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Meeting the needs of hearing-impaired infants.
    Rubin M
    Pediatr Ann; 1980 Jan; 9(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 7367049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Long-term progress in reading abilities in hearing-impaired children trained by the Kanazawa method.
    Notoya M; Suzuki S; Furukawa M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1996; 23():43-7. PubMed ID: 8809322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [The course and results of speech rehabilitation in deaf preschool children].
    HANDZEL L
    Pediatr Pol; 1962 Jan; 37():57-64. PubMed ID: 13904325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Effects of auditory feedback deprivation length on the vowel /epsilon/ produced by pediatric cochlear-implant users.
    Bharadwaj SV; Graves AG; Bauer DD; Assmann PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 May; 121(5 Pt1):EL196-202. PubMed ID: 17550203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Early education of the deaf.
    Adler HJ; Liebman J; Raphael RM; Ratnanather JT; Steyger PS
    Science; 1998 Mar; 279(5357):1617. PubMed ID: 9518371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Current trends in the rehabilitation of the severly deaf child].
    Walter F
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1972; 26(6):684-92. PubMed ID: 4669682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Improvement in speech perception and production abilities in children using a multichannel cochlear implant.
    Waltzman S; Cohen NL; Spivak L; Ying E; Brackett D; Shapiro W; Hoffman R
    Laryngoscope; 1990 Mar; 100(3):240-3. PubMed ID: 2308447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.