These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5361078)

  • 1. [Comparative studies on bifidobacteria isolated from the alimentary tract of man and animals (including descriptions of bifidobacterium thermophilum nov. spec. and bifidobacterium pseudolongum nov. spec)].
    Mitsuoka T
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig; 1969 May; 210(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 5361078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Comparative studies on lactobacilli from the faeces of man, swine and chickens].
    Mitsuoka T
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig; 1969 May; 210(1):32-51. PubMed ID: 4982872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium microflora of the human intestine: composition and succession.
    Reuter G
    Curr Issues Intest Microbiol; 2001 Sep; 2(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 11721280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The development of the flora of the alimentary tract in young animals.
    Smith HW
    J Pathol Bacteriol; 1965 Oct; 90(2):495-513. PubMed ID: 4285022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Intestinal flora and their growth in man and animals].
    Mitsuoka T
    Nihon Ishikai Zasshi; 1972 Jan; 67(2):132-48. PubMed ID: 4622190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bifidobacteria as indicators of faecal contamination along a sheep meat production chain.
    Delcenserie V; Loncaric D; Bonaparte C; Upmann M; China B; Daube G; Gavini F
    J Appl Microbiol; 2008 Jan; 104(1):276-84. PubMed ID: 17922830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Antagonistic properties of bifidobacteria isolated from different natural sources].
    Poltavs'ka OA; Kovalenko NK
    Mikrobiol Z; 2005; 67(2):70-80. PubMed ID: 16018219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electron microscopic, biochemical and physiological studies of Bifidobacterium pseudolongum SS-24 and Bifidobacterium thermophilum SS-19.
    Kudo H; Kimura N; Suzuki M; Cheng KJ; Costerton JW; Mitsuoka T
    Zentralbl Bakteriol; 1989 Sep; 271(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 2803454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Antagonistic activity of probiotic lactobacilli and bifidobacteria against entero- and uropathogens.
    Hütt P; Shchepetova J; Lõivukene K; Kullisaar T; Mikelsaar M
    J Appl Microbiol; 2006 Jun; 100(6):1324-32. PubMed ID: 16696680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening of exopolysaccharide-producing Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains isolated from the human intestinal microbiota.
    Ruas-Madiedo P; Moreno JA; Salazar N; Delgado S; Mayo B; Margolles A; de Los Reyes-Gavilán CG
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2007 Jul; 73(13):4385-8. PubMed ID: 17483284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antibiotic susceptibility testing of Bifidobacterium thermophilum and Bifidobacterium pseudolongum strains: broth microdilution vs. agar disc diffusion assay.
    Domig KJ; Mayrhofer S; Zitz U; Mair C; Petersson A; Amtmann E; Mayer HK; Kneifel W
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Nov; 120(1-2):191-5. PubMed ID: 17884216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lactobacillus sobrius sp. nov., abundant in the intestine of weaning piglets.
    Konstantinov SR; Poznanski E; Fuentes S; Akkermans AD; Smidt H; de Vos WM
    Int J Syst Evol Microbiol; 2006 Jan; 56(Pt 1):29-32. PubMed ID: 16403862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [A comparative evaluation of culture media for isolating bifidobacteria, lactobacillus and enterococci].
    Guloian TE; Zargarian OP; Medoian AA; Dorunts ON
    Lab Delo; 1990; (12):73-4. PubMed ID: 1710702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Bifidobacterium mixed-species microarray for high resolution discrimination between intestinal bifidobacteria.
    Boesten RJ; Schuren FH; de Vos WM
    J Microbiol Methods; 2009 Mar; 76(3):269-77. PubMed ID: 19141304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Biological activity of probiotic microorganisms].
    Novik GI; Samartsev AA; Astapovich NI; Kavrus MA; Mikhaliuk AN
    Prikl Biokhim Mikrobiol; 2006; 42(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 16761572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Lactic acid bacteria in the intestinal tract of chickens raised commercially].
    Kvasnikov EI; Shishlevskaia TN; Kovalenko NK
    Mikrobiol Zh (1978); 1981; 43(6):703-8. PubMed ID: 7332682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [The antibacterial properties of the intestinal microflora of healthy calves].
    Konarzhevs'kyĭ KIe; Tsymbal OM; Diduk TB; Stanislav VI
    Mikrobiol Z; 1998; 60(4):67-72. PubMed ID: 9859643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bifidobacterium-selective isolation and enumeration from chicken caeca by a modified oligosaccharide antibiotic-selective agar medium.
    Thitaram SN; Siragusa GR; Hinton A
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2005; 41(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 16162144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [New approaches to the problem of the regulation of intestinal microflora].
    Korshunov VM; Pinegin BV
    Vestn Akad Med Nauk SSSR; 1985; (10):66-73. PubMed ID: 4082759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utilization of resistant starch of native tapioca, corn and waxy corn starches and their retrograded preparations by Bifidobacterium.
    Wronkowska M; Soral-Smietana M; Biedrzycka E
    Int J Food Sci Nutr; 2008 Feb; 59(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 18097846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.