These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Accuracy of intraocular lens powers calculated from A-scan biometry with the Echo-Oculometer. Schachar RA; Levy NS; Bonney RC Ophthalmic Surg; 1980 Dec; 11(12):856-8. PubMed ID: 7207958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The accuracy of ultrasonic measurement of the axial length of the eye. Binkhorst RD Ophthalmic Surg; 1981 May; 12(5):363-5. PubMed ID: 7266984 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Axial length measurement and its relation to intraocular lens power calculations. Shammas HJ J Am Intraocul Implant Soc; 1982; 8(4):346-9. PubMed ID: 7166517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The newer generation intraocular lens power calculation formulae in anterior chamber implants. Sunderraj P; Villada JR Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 5)():499-501. PubMed ID: 1286714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Olsen T Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Aug; 85(5):472-85. PubMed ID: 17403024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Change in effective power of posterior chamber lenses placed with the plano surface anterior. Downing JE; Sayano RR J Am Intraocul Implant Soc; 1983; 9(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 6630003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Theoretical formulas for the power of artificial lenses]. Aflalo G J Fr Ophtalmol; 1987; 10(4):283-93. PubMed ID: 3305677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Refractive power calculations for intraocular lenses in the phakic eye. Holladay JT Am J Ophthalmol; 1993 Jul; 116(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 8328545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Echobiometric evaluation of the axial length of the eye and intraocular lens calculation in pseudophakic eyes: our experience. Polizzi A; Schenone M; Ciurlo C; Bertagno R; Molfino F; Camoriano GP; Saccà SC Ophthalmologica; 1998; 212 Suppl 1():25-6. PubMed ID: 9730742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the Digital Biometric Ruler-300 and Echo-oculometer-3000: a report of two hundred cases. Sanders DR; Kraff MC J Am Intraocul Implant Soc; 1982; 8(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 7166523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lenstar® LS 900 vs Pentacam®-AXL: Comparative study of ocular biometric measurements and intraocular lens power calculation. Pereira JMM; Neves A; Alfaiate P; Santos M; Aragão H; Sousa JC Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 28(6):645-651. PubMed ID: 29788776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Standardizing constants for ultrasonic biometry, keratometry, and intraocular lens power calculations. Holladay JT J Cataract Refract Surg; 1997 Nov; 23(9):1356-70. PubMed ID: 9423908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasonic measurement of eye dimensions. Coleman DJ Int Ophthalmol Clin; 1979; 19(4):225-36. PubMed ID: 536130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The correlation of corneal refractive power, axial length, and the refractive power of the emmetropizing intraocular lens in cataractous eyes. Sayegh FN Ger J Ophthalmol; 1996 Nov; 5(6):328-31. PubMed ID: 9479513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The emmetropic and the iseikonic implant lens: computer calculation of the refractive power and its accuracy. Thijssen JM Ophthalmologica; 1975; 171(6):467-86. PubMed ID: 1178154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]