These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5361512)

  • 41. Tonal masking and frequency selectivity for the monaural and binaural hearing systems.
    Yama MF; Small AM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jan; 73(1):285-90. PubMed ID: 6826897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Assessing binaural/bimodal advantages using auditory event-related potentials in subjects with cochlear implants.
    Sasaki T; Yamamoto K; Iwaki T; Kubo T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Oct; 36(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 19297109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Auditory filter bandwidths in binaural and monaural listening conditions.
    Kollmeier B; Holube I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):1889-901. PubMed ID: 1401533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effects of stimulus presentation mode and subcortical laterality in speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses.
    Ahadi M; Pourbakht A; Jafari AH; Jalaie S
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Apr; 53(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 24506562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Auditory tract asymmetry in brainstem electrical responses during binaural stimulation.
    Decker TN; Howe SW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Apr; 69(4):1084-90. PubMed ID: 7229194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Additivity of loud-sound--induced threshold losses in the cat under conditions of active or inactive cochlear efferent-mediated protection.
    Rajan R
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Apr; 75(4):1601-18. PubMed ID: 8727399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Speech-in-noise perception in unilateral hearing loss: Relation to pure-tone thresholds and brainstem plasticity.
    Vannson N; James CJ; Fraysse B; Lescure B; Strelnikov K; Deguine O; Barone P; Marx M
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jul; 102():135-143. PubMed ID: 28623107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Coding of temporally fluctuating interaural timing disparities in a binaural processing model based on phase differences.
    Dietz M; Ewert SD; Hohmann V; Kollmeier B
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():234-45. PubMed ID: 17949695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Examination of binaural signal processing in normally hearing subjects using electrophysiological and psychoacoustical measurements].
    Walger M; Stötzer S; Meister H; Foerst A; von Wedel H
    HNO; 2003 Feb; 51(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 12589418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Recovery from temporary threshold shifts as a function of test and exposure frequencies.
    Smith RP; Loeb M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1969 Jan; 45(1):238-9. PubMed ID: 5797144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Late-onset auditory deprivation: effects of monaural versus binaural hearing aids.
    Silman S; Gelfand SA; Silverman CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Nov; 76(5):1357-62. PubMed ID: 6512097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Temporary sensory hearing deficits after ear surgery--a retrospective analysis].
    Schick B; Schick BT; Kochannek S; Starlinger V; Iro H
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2007 Mar; 86(3):200-5. PubMed ID: 17131257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [The auditory intensity discrimination and its audiological and clinical applications (author's transl)].
    Chocholle R
    Audiology; 1975; 14(4):312-35. PubMed ID: 1147852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Observations on temporary auditory threshold shift resulting from noise-exposure.
    GLORIG A; SUMMERFIELD A; WARD WD
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1958 Sep; 67(3):824-47. PubMed ID: 13583905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Binaural cochlear implants.
    Green JD; Mills DM; Bell BA; Luxford WM; Tonokawa LL
    Am J Otol; 1992 Nov; 13(6):502-6. PubMed ID: 1449175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Reactions to binaural hearing aid fitting.
    Markides A
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():197-205. PubMed ID: 6955926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. THE FIT TEST. MONAURAL THRESHOLD FINDING THROUGH BINAURAL FUSION.
    BERGMAN M
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1964 Oct; 80():440-9. PubMed ID: 14198709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Efficient monaural procedure for the psychoacoustic calibration of earphones.
    Harris JD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1970 Apr; 47(4):1048-54. PubMed ID: 5443151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Triplet testing and training; an approach to band discrimination and its monaural or binaural summation.
    HUIZING HC; TASELAAR M
    Laryngoscope; 1958 Mar; 68(3):535-8. PubMed ID: 13551102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.