These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5372623)

  • 1. [Experimental contribution to vowel discrimination in frequency transposition of the formants].
    Schlöndorff G; Tegtmeier W
    Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1969 Dec; 194(2):466-9. PubMed ID: 5372623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Presbyacusis. V. Filtered speech test.
    Palva A; Jokinen K
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1970 Oct; 70(4):232-41. PubMed ID: 5491160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychoacoustic comparison of cochlear and 8th nerve disorders.
    Jerger J; Jerger S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1967 Dec; 10(4):659-88. PubMed ID: 5586933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Methods for assessing high frequency hearing loss in every-day listening situations.
    Aniansson G
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1974; 320():1-50. PubMed ID: 4532460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some relationships between pitch discrimination and speech development.
    BRADLEY WH
    Trans Am Laryngol Rhinol Otol Soc; 1959 Jan; 1959():2-18. PubMed ID: 13848110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. DIPLACUSIS IN UNILATERAL HIGH-FREQUENCY HEARING LOSSES.
    GAETH JH; NORRIS TW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1965 Mar; 8():63-75. PubMed ID: 14311806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Objective audiological diagnosis].
    Rahne T; Plontke S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Oct; 91(10):649-64, quiz 665-6. PubMed ID: 23011667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of subtle mid-frequency auditory dysfunction upon speech discrimination in noise.
    Findlay RC; Denenberg LJ
    Audiology; 1977; 16(3):252-9. PubMed ID: 880129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perception of periodicity pitch by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Purvis GO; Brandt JF
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 1(6):269-75. PubMed ID: 931763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. PITCH DISCRIMINATION BY ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSE.
    SHIMIZU H; GELDERMAN A; HARDY WG
    Laryngoscope; 1964 Nov; 74():1570-81. PubMed ID: 14224072
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential intensity sensitivity and clinical masking.
    Blegvad B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1969 Apr; 67(4):428-34. PubMed ID: 5371325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing aid low frequency cut: effect on Mandarin tone and vowel perception in normal-hearing listeners.
    Zhang J; McPherson B
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008; 60(4):179-87. PubMed ID: 18446038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perstimulatory tracking in pitch perception by subjects with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Skinner P; Antinoro F
    J Speech Hear Res; 1970 Sep; 13(3):518-25. PubMed ID: 5507112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A FACTOR ANALYTIC STUDY OF THREE SIGNAL DETECTION ABILITIES.
    HARRIS JD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1964 Mar; 7():71-8. PubMed ID: 14130745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discrimination performance of high school sophomores on a battery of auditory tests.
    Elliott DN; Riach WD; Sheposh JP; Trahiotis C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1966; ():Suppl 216:1-59. PubMed ID: 5935910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of native vowel processing ability and frequency discrimination acuity on the phonetic training of English vowels for native speakers of Greek.
    Lengeris A; Hazan V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3757-68. PubMed ID: 21218907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Determination of the degree of defective hearing using speech audiography].
    Niemeyer W
    Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1969 Dec; 194(2):508-14. PubMed ID: 5372632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combined electric and acoustic hearing performance with Zebra® speech processor: speech reception, place, and temporal coding evaluation.
    Vaerenberg B; Péan V; Lesbros G; De Ceulaer G; Schauwers K; Daemers K; Gnansia D; Govaerts PJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):150-7. PubMed ID: 23321588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effect of time resolution ability on selective hearing disorders].
    von Wedel H
    HNO; 1982 Oct; 30(10):388-92. PubMed ID: 7153074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Place pitch discrimination and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.
    Hanekom JJ; Shannon RV
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 1996; 43():27-40. PubMed ID: 9265842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.