These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5372632)

  • 1. [Determination of the degree of defective hearing using speech audiography].
    Niemeyer W
    Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1969 Dec; 194(2):508-14. PubMed ID: 5372632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Determination of the percentage of hearing loss from tone and speech audiometric measurements].
    Plath P
    Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1969 Dec; 194(2):504-8. PubMed ID: 5372631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Clinical and social aspects of speech audiometry. A comparative study of various speech audiometric materials].
    Parving A; Barfod J; Salomon G
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1976 Jan; 138(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 1251486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [On the correlation in the perception of elementary and complex acoustic forms].
    Lafon JC; Guichard J; Petitjean Y
    J Fr Otorhinolaryngol Audiophonol Chir Maxillofac (1967); 1968 Mar; 17(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 4246929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Methods for assessing high frequency hearing loss in every-day listening situations.
    Aniansson G
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1974; 320():1-50. PubMed ID: 4532460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [New tables for the determination of percentile loss of speech hearing].
    Boenninghaus HG; Röser D
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1973 Mar; 52(3):153-61. PubMed ID: 4698063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Speech intelligibility in presence of ambient noise].
    Grisanti G
    Valsalva; 1966 Dec; 42(6):348-72. PubMed ID: 5998165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The testing of Boenninghaus' and Röser's new tables for the determination of percentile hearing loss].
    Brusis T; Feldmann H
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1973 Mar; 52(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 4698064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A suggestion on the determination of percentage of disability hearing disorders in higher frequency ranges].
    Frey HH; Tietze G
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1967 Aug; 46(8):556-61. PubMed ID: 5596114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Speech audiometry under noisy conditions].
    Siargava VA
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1967; 29(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 5620016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.
    Hagerman B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1984; 21():1-25. PubMed ID: 6589731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Lee and Lombard effects in determining the auditory selfcontrol of speech in children with hearing disorders].
    Belov IM; Podgornykh AV; Shevchenko GF
    Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1975; (5):31-4. PubMed ID: 1231382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Polyacusis", a hearing anomaly.
    Corliss EL; Burnett ED; Stimson HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1968 Jun; 43(6):1231-6. PubMed ID: 5659489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Audiologic examinations of the masking effect caused by flight noise].
    Lorenz W
    Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol; 1969; 103(10):438-44. PubMed ID: 5371565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An audiological test battery for speech communication diagnosis in severe hearing loss.
    Risberg A; Agelfors E
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1983; 18():5-10. PubMed ID: 6577575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [School audiometry practice of a district hospital].
    Buchholz W; David A
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1970 Oct; 49(10):670-7. PubMed ID: 5509322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [On the correlation between disturbance in the audibility of pure tones and the degree of perception of speech sounds].
    Kharshak EM
    Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1965; 25(3):45-50. PubMed ID: 5876976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Quantitative evaluation of hearing disorders in expert assessment. A recent recommendation for calculating the percentage of hearing loss].
    Feldmann H
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1988 Jul; 67(7):319-25. PubMed ID: 3062285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effect of a weak sound stimulus on the discernibility of speech].
    Kristostur'ian CG; Bavli AN
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1969; 31(5):56-60. PubMed ID: 5375861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Discrimination and critical signal to noise ratio of normal and pathological hearing (author's transl)].
    von Wedel H
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1977 Feb; 56(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 139521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.