These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5382261)
1. Roentgen image perception--a personal survey of the problem. Tuddenham WJ Radiol Clin North Am; 1969 Dec; 7(3):499-501. PubMed ID: 5382261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Psychophysiological parameters in the perception of the roentgenologic image (a survey of the foreign literature)]. Rogovin MS; Urvantsev LP Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1973; 48(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 4576335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A model for the radiologic process. Blesser B; Ozonoff D Radiology; 1972 Jun; 103(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 5022946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Psychological analysis of the causes of errors in roentgen diagnosis]. Rogovin MS; Urvantsev PL; Kurochkin NI Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1983; (6):61-6. PubMed ID: 6678059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Symposium on perception of the roentgen image. Foreword. Tuddenham WJ Radiol Clin North Am; 1969 Dec; 7(3):379-80. PubMed ID: 5382254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital radiography: a survey of pediatric dentists. Russo JM; Russo JA; Guelmann M J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(3):132-5. PubMed ID: 17367028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Some factors affecting image clarity and detail perception in the radiograph. Sweeney RJ Radiol Technol; 1975; 46(6):443-51. PubMed ID: 1129455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Ignorance is not bliss: knowledge, information, and the diagnostic technology problem. Larson EB AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Dec; 145(6):1124-8. PubMed ID: 3904368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Mach bands and density perception. Lane EJ; Proto AV; Phillips TW Radiology; 1976 Oct; 121(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 959562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Recording and perception in diagnostic roentgenology]. Salinger H Harefuah; 1969 Nov; 77(10):447-9. PubMed ID: 5397699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Betwixt and between false positives and negatives. Hunter TB Rev Interam Radiol; 1980 Apr; 5(2):59-63. PubMed ID: 7384681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Diagnostic errors in radiography. Reasons and possibilities of prevention]. Longin F; Hippeli R Munch Med Wochenschr; 1971 Oct; 113(44):1459-63. PubMed ID: 5171460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Advice to the class of '94. Bligh J Radiol Technol; 1994; 65(5):336, 335. PubMed ID: 8058917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [ON THE USE OF AN IMAGE AMPLIFIER IN THE ROENTGEN DIAGNOSIS OF THE GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT]. GARBSCH H Wien Z Inn Med; 1963 Aug; 44():361-8. PubMed ID: 14055711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Diagnostic value of digital projection radiography in comparison with conventional roentgen technique]. Krug B; Zähringer M; Lackner K Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Mar; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 9172665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Film retakes in digital and conventional radiography. Akhtar W; Aslam M; Ali A; Mirza K; Ahmad N J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2008 Mar; 18(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 18460242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]