These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5383498)

  • 1. The problems of the defense expert.
    Grant J
    J Forensic Sci Soc; 1969 Dec; 9(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 5383498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The British Academy of Forensic Sciences. Memorandum. Forensic medicine and forensic science and legal education (May 1970).
    Med Sci Law; 1971 Jan; 11(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 5575827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Where have all the lawyers gone?
    Brownlie AR
    J Forensic Sci Soc; 1972 Oct; 12(4):547-52. PubMed ID: 4661498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The presentation of scientific evidence in the courts--improving its effectiveness.
    Cato BH
    J Forensic Sci Soc; 1974 Apr; 14(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 4416429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The assessment of a doctor as a forensic witness.
    Blair D
    Med Sci Law; 1973 Jul; 13(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 4729112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence and proof: scientific and legal.
    Ormrod RF
    Med Sci Law; 1972 Jan; 12(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 5024114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forensic science and miscarriages of justice.
    Samuels A; Barrister JP
    Med Sci Law; 1994 Apr; 34(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 8028490
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The problem of the availability of forensic science facilities to the defence.
    Grant J
    Med Sci Law; 1989 Oct; 29(4):348. PubMed ID: 2629728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The submission of the British Academy of Forensic Sciences to the Royal Commission on Legal Services.
    Med Sci Law; 1978 Jul; 18(3):222-3. PubMed ID: 672542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [ON THE PROBLEMS OF EVALUATION OF WITNESSES AND DEFENDANTS BY THE SAME EXPERT].
    CABANIS D
    Munch Med Wochenschr; 1964 Oct; 106():1785-7. PubMed ID: 14332774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MEDICO-LEGAL ASPECTS OF DRUG TOXICITY.
    CONSTABLE HA
    Practitioner; 1965 Jan; 194():22-5. PubMed ID: 14259686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medico-legalism.
    Nagle R
    Med Sci Law; 1970 Jul; 10(3):158-9. PubMed ID: 5493663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finding out the truth in court.
    Napley D
    Med Leg J; 1980; 48(1):7-24. PubMed ID: 7366531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The inquisitorial versus the trial system.
    Foster J
    Med Leg J; 1967; 35(3):88-102. PubMed ID: 6056081
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The UK legal system.
    Rea K
    Nursing (Lond); 1987 Feb; 3(14):537-9. PubMed ID: 3644186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The adequacy of the disciplinary jurisdiction of the General Medical Council.
    Taylor JL
    Med Leg J; 1967; 35(3):119-29. PubMed ID: 6056080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Some theoretical problems of forensic medicine and the forensic-medical examination (author's transl)].
    Avdeev MI
    Z Rechtsmed; 1973 Aug; 73(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 4784138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Justice in a goldfish bowl.
    Forrest AR
    Sci Justice; 2002; 42(3):133-4. PubMed ID: 12501585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Libel and medicine.
    Gray C
    Med Leg J; 1991; 59 ( Pt 3)():142-51; discussion 151-6. PubMed ID: 1749360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MALPRACTICE AND THE CLINICAL LABORATORY.
    MILLS DH
    Science; 1964 May; 144(3619):638-42. PubMed ID: 14133073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.