These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5384327)

  • 1. [Study of corneal biometrics using a photographic technic].
    Collignon-Brach J
    Ophthalmologica; 1969; 159(4):442-59. PubMed ID: 5384327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Refractive plasticity of the developing chick eye.
    Irving EL; Sivak JG; Callender MG
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Oct; 12(4):448-56. PubMed ID: 1293533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Biometry of myopia].
    François J; Goes F
    Ophthalmologica; 1973; 167(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 4796108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry readings after corneal refractive surgery.
    Holladay JT
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jan; 36(1):182-3; author reply 183-4. PubMed ID: 20117729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Determination of the true size of the papilla in patients. (contribution to the diagnosis of micropapilla)].
    Jaeger W
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1983; 80(6):527-32. PubMed ID: 6662462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation of Corneal Biomechanical Stiffness With Refractive Error and Ocular Biometry in a Pediatric Population.
    Matalia J; Francis M; Gogri P; Panmand P; Matalia H; Sinha Roy A
    Cornea; 2017 Oct; 36(10):1221-1226. PubMed ID: 28731878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The examination method, equipment, and biometry.
    Cochet P; Amiard H
    Int Ophthalmol Clin; 1969; 9(2):243-96. PubMed ID: 5386723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Micropachometry: a technique for measuring the thickness of the corneal epithelium.
    Wilson G; O'Leary DJ; Henson D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1980 Apr; 19(4):414-7. PubMed ID: 7358494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of anterior segment measurements with rotating Scheimpflug photography and partial coherence reflectometry.
    Huang J; Pesudovs K; Wen D; Chen S; Wright T; Wang X; Li Y; Wang Q
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Feb; 37(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 21241919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Pitfalls of IOL power prediction after photorefractive keratectomy for high myopia -- case report, practical recommendations and literature review].
    Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Haigis W
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Dec; 219(12):840-50. PubMed ID: 12548468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pupil size and Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry readings.
    Lam S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Jan; 36(1):184; author reply 184. PubMed ID: 20117731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Photographic biometry of the corneal limbus gradient in normal subjects and in narrow-angle glaucoma].
    Delmarcelle Y; Collignon-Brach J
    Ophthalmologica; 1973; 166(2):110-9. PubMed ID: 4700134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New equivalent keratometry reading calculation with a rotating Scheimpflug camera for intraocular lens power calculation after myopic corneal surgery.
    Seo KY; Im CY; Yang H; Kim TI; Kim EK; Kim T; Nam SM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Nov; 40(11):1834-42. PubMed ID: 25442883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry readings after corneal refractive surgery.
    Tang Q; Hoffer KJ; Olson MD; Miller KM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jul; 35(7):1198-203. PubMed ID: 19545808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Malleability of the ocular surface in response to mechanical stress induced by orthokeratology contact lenses.
    Lu F; Simpson T; Sorbara L; Fonn D
    Cornea; 2008 Feb; 27(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 18216565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of corneal aberrations on intraocular lens power calculations.
    Canovas C; Abenza S; Alcon E; Villegas EA; Marin JM; Artal P
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Aug; 38(8):1325-32. PubMed ID: 22814039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Study of corneal thickness and curvature of Egyptian eyes.
    Gawdat I
    Bull Ophthalmol Soc Egypt; 1976; 69(73):75-9. PubMed ID: 1031136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Scheimpflug photographic imaging following implantation of anterior and posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses: preliminary results].
    Baumeister M; Bühren J; Schnitzler EM; Ohrloff C; Kohnen T
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Feb; 218(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 11258125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biometry of phakic intraocular lens using Scheimpflug photography.
    Coppens JE; van den Berg TJ; Budo CJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Oct; 31(10):1904-14. PubMed ID: 16338559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparison of keratometric values and corneal eccentricity of myopia, hyperopia and emmetropia].
    Benes P; Synek S; Petrová S
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2011; 67(5-6):181-6. PubMed ID: 22448420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.