These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5385731)

  • 1. Practice effects in frequency discrimination by hearing impaired children.
    Gengel RW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1969 Dec; 12(4):847-56. PubMed ID: 5385731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech discrimination in noise.
    Cooper JC; Cutts BP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Jun; 14(2):332-7. PubMed ID: 5558087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Loudness discomfort level modification.
    Schmitz HD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1969 Dec; 12(4):807-17. PubMed ID: 5385726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An item-difficulty based speech discrimination test.
    Margolis RH; Millin JP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Dec; 14(4):865-73. PubMed ID: 5163916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Picture-sound association in deaf children.
    Doehring DG
    J Speech Hear Res; 1968 Mar; 11(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 5648539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variables influencing performance on speech-sound discrimination tests.
    Schwartz AH; Goldman R
    J Speech Hear Res; 1974 Mar; 17(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 4828359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Linguistic performance of hard-of-hearing and normal-hearing children.
    Wilcox J; Tobin H
    J Speech Hear Res; 1974 Jun; 17(2):286-93. PubMed ID: 4836046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [New recording of the Freiburg speech discrimination test].
    Plath P
    HNO; 1971 Sep; 19(9):282-4. PubMed ID: 5111437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality judgments of hearing aid transduced speech.
    Witter HL; Goldstein DP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Jun; 14(2):312-22. PubMed ID: 5558085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DISCRIMINATION PRETRAINING AND SOUND LEARNING.
    WINITZ H; PREISLER L
    Percept Mot Skills; 1965 Jun; 20():905-16. PubMed ID: 14314014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of severely hearing-impaired children on a closed-response, auditory speech discrimination test.
    Jones KO; Studebaker GA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1974 Sep; 17(3):531-40. PubMed ID: 4423159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of practice and the observation of practice in speech-sound discrimination learning.
    Ritterman SI
    J Speech Hear Res; 1970 Mar; 13(1):178-83. PubMed ID: 5421130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Investigations on the intelligibleness of a new record of the German Freiburg speech discrimination test].
    Plath P; Stühlen HW; Graf H; Pelzer H
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1973 Jun; 52(6):457-69. PubMed ID: 4734046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hearing aid distortion and consonant identification.
    Bode DL; Kasten RN
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Jun; 14(2):323-31. PubMed ID: 5558086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vowel discrimination of hearing-impaired listeners.
    Owens E; Talbott CB; Schubert ED
    J Speech Hear Res; 1968 Sep; 11(3):648-55. PubMed ID: 5722492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6: normative and comparative intelligibility functions.
    Wilson RH; Coley KE; Haenel JL; Browning KM
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 1(5):221-8. PubMed ID: 956010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Electronic organization for hearing, voice and speech studies at the Graz University HNO Clinic].
    Horwath T
    Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol; 1966 Apr; 100(4):169-72. PubMed ID: 16114387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Speech discrimination in sensori-neural hearing loss: two experiments on the role of intensity.
    Yantis PA; Millin JP; Shapiro I
    J Speech Hear Res; 1966 Jun; 9(2):178-93. PubMed ID: 5925522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative evaluation of five speech discrimination measures.
    Lovrinic JH; Burgi EJ; Curry ET
    J Speech Hear Res; 1968 Jun; 11(2):372-81. PubMed ID: 5664265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Fairbanks Rhyme Test and CID auditory test W-22 in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kopra LL; Blosser D; Waldron DL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1968 Dec; 11(4):735-9. PubMed ID: 5719227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.