These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 538625)

  • 1. Effect of splenectomy and autologous splenic implantation on a Streptococcus pneumoniae challenge.
    Whiteside DC; Thomas CG
    Surg Forum; 1979; 30():32-4. PubMed ID: 538625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraperitoneal splenic implants do not alter clearance of pneumococcal bacteremia.
    Scher KS; Wroczynski AF; Scott-Conner C
    Am Surg; 1985 May; 51(5):269-71. PubMed ID: 3994168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Splenic autotransplant function in experimental bacteremia.
    Weiss SM; Rosato FE; Stewart E; Murphey SA; Jungkind DL
    Surg Forum; 1979; 30():30-2. PubMed ID: 44021
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protection against pneumococcal bacteremia by partial splenectomy.
    Greco RS; Alvarez FE
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Jan; 152(1):67-9. PubMed ID: 7455894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of omental splenic autotransplant to partial splenectomy. Protective effect against septic death.
    Steely WM; Satava RM; Harris RW; Quispe G
    Am Surg; 1987 Dec; 53(12):702-5. PubMed ID: 3425994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Immunologic function against infection in splenic autotransplanted mice].
    Maruyama A; Sekikawa T
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 May; 92(5):567-76. PubMed ID: 1875898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Protection against pneumococcal sepsis in splenectomized rats by implantation of splenic tissue into an omental pouch.
    Patel J; Williams JS; Naim JO; Hinshaw JR
    Curr Surg; 1981; 38(5):323-5. PubMed ID: 7297111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Autotransplantation of splenic tissue after splenectomy in rats offers partial protection against intravenous pneumococcal challenge.
    Harding B; Kenny F; Given F; Murphy B; Lavelle S
    Eur Surg Res; 1987; 19(3):135-9. PubMed ID: 3609076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Heterotopic splenic autotransplantation in prevention of overwhelming postsplenectomy infection.
    Cooney DR; Swanson SE; Dearth JC; Dewanjee MK; Telander RL
    J Pediatr Surg; 1979 Jun; 14(3):337-42. PubMed ID: 39128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prevention of postsplenectomy pneumococcal sepsis in rats.
    Tesluk GC; Thomas CG
    Surg Forum; 1979; 30():35-7. PubMed ID: 583454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved survival rate for intraperitoneal autotransplantation of the spleen following pneumococcal pneumonia.
    Livingston CD; Levine BA; Sirinek KR
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1983 Jun; 156(6):761-6. PubMed ID: 6857455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraportal and intrahepatic splenic autotransplantation.
    Greco RS; Alvarez FE
    Surgery; 1981 Sep; 90(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 7268631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Splenectomy does not influence outcome of pneumococcal septicemia in a porcine model.
    Izbicki JR; Ziegler-Heitbrock HW; Raedler C; Kastl S; Bauhuber W; Wilker DK; Lütticken R; Ruckdeschel G; Schlunck T; Anke A
    J Trauma; 1991 Feb; 31(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 1994078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does survival depend on the amount of autotransplanted splenic tissue?
    Shokouh-Amiri MH; Rahimi-Saber S; Hansen CP; Olsen PS; Jensen SL
    Arch Surg; 1990 Nov; 125(11):1472-4. PubMed ID: 2241559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Protection against fulminant sepsis in splenectomized mice by implantation of autochthonous splenic tissue.
    Likhite VV
    Exp Hematol; 1978 May; 6(5):433-9. PubMed ID: 77790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative methods of splenic preservation.
    Cooney DR; Michalak WA; Michalak DM; Fisher JE
    J Pediatr Surg; 1981 Jun; 16(3):327-38. PubMed ID: 7252737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Poor protective effect of unregenerated splenic tissue to pneumococcal challenge after subtotal splenectomy.
    Goldthorn JF; Schwartz AD
    Surg Forum; 1978; 29():469-70. PubMed ID: 401226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Omental autoimplantation of splenic tissue and intravenous pneumococcal challenge. A comparative study in rats.
    Capizzi FD; Frusci V; Lioi V; Abate L; Cavalli G; Re G; Cau R; Gatti M; Eusebi V; Bellanova B
    Ital J Surg Sci; 1989; 19(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 2628385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protection against pneumococcal sepsis in splenectomized rats by implantation of splenic tissue into an omental pouch.
    Patel J; Williams JS; Naim JO; Hinshaw JR
    Surgery; 1982 Jun; 91(6):638-41. PubMed ID: 7079963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcome of pneumococcal challenge in rats after splenic artery ligation or splenectomy.
    Andersson R; Alwmark A; Bengmark S
    Acta Chir Scand; 1986 Jan; 152():15-7. PubMed ID: 3953211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.