These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
62. Experience with intrauterine contraceptive device in Ibadan. Ojo OA West Afr Med J Niger Med Dent Pract; 1973 Aug; 22(4):71-7. PubMed ID: 4799783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Uterine perforation following insertion of IUCD. Report of a case. Pystynen P; Ylöstalo P Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1968; 57(1):107-9. PubMed ID: 5685018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. Risk of uterine perforation among users of intrauterine devices. Heartwell SF; Schlesselman S Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jan; 61(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 6823347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Studies on intrauterine contraceptive devices. IV. The position of IUD in the cavity of uterus and nidation of fertilized ova. Sakurabayashi M; Mohri T; Ono T; Takabatake H Acta Obstet Gynaecol Jpn; 1969 Oct; 16(4):275-84. PubMed ID: 5394733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Laparoscopic removal of intrauterine contraceptive devices following uterine perforation. Leventhal JM; Simon LR; Shapiro SS Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1971 Sep; 111(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 4255414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. The simultaneous and combined use of laparoscopy and hysterosalpingography using image amplification. Brooks P; Berci G; Adler D J Reprod Med; 1973 Jun; 10(6):285-90. PubMed ID: 4268367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. [Adhesion lysis and removal of an intraperitoneal contraceptive device by celioscopy]. Landowski P; Cristalli B; Levardon M; de Jolinière JB Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1990 Nov; 85(11):623-5. PubMed ID: 2149200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. A four-year report on loop D. Hall RE Int J Fertil; 1968; 13(4):309-13. PubMed ID: 5700386 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. [Deformity of the uterine cavity by the DANA super intrauterine pessary (Birnberg-bow)]. Nesit V Zentralbl Gynakol; 1972 Apr; 94(16):527-32. PubMed ID: 5043994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. IUDs reassessed--a decade of experience. Huber SC; Piotrow PT; Orlans FB; Kommer G Popul Rep B; 1975 Jan; (2):21-48. PubMed ID: 1089571 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. Uterine perforation with the Margulies spiral. DeHaan QC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1966 Sep; 96(2):294-5. PubMed ID: 5950774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Laparoscopic removal of ectopic intrauterine devices. Kozloff SR; Engel T; Bernstein D; Silverberg S Rocky Mt Med J; 1972 Nov; 69(11):41-3. PubMed ID: 4264312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. [Perforation of the uterus caused by copper-containing IUD's]. van der Does CD; Trimbos JB Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1980 Oct; 124(42):1780-2. PubMed ID: 7191949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Uterine perforation with I.U.C.D. during puerperium. Waghmarae D Br Med J; 1967 May; 2(5548):376-7. PubMed ID: 6067152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Colpotomy to retrieve IUD. Ammann M Obstet Gynecol; 1968 Aug; 32(2):294-5. PubMed ID: 5742110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. Pseudoectopic intrauterine contraceptive device (a case report). Chung AF; Birnbaum SJ Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1972 Sep; 114(2):272-3. PubMed ID: 4673809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. [A case of IUD migration into the peritoneal cavity]. Sabbatino M; Oliaro A; Billia P; Giangreco B Minerva Ginecol; 1981 Dec; 33(12):1155-8. PubMed ID: 7038557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Clinical significance of correlation between size of uterine cavity and IUCD. A study by planimeter-hysterogram technique. Tejuja S; Malkani PK Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1969 Oct; 105(4):620-7. PubMed ID: 5824884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]