These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 539563)
1. Who determines the risk to human health associated with energy technology. Dufour JT Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1979 Dec; 40(12):1207-16. PubMed ID: 539563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of energy production on human health. Weaver NK Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1979 Dec; 40(12):1164-71. PubMed ID: 539559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Rationing expensive lifesaving medical treatments. Mehlman MJ Wis L Rev; 1985; 1985(2):239-303. PubMed ID: 11658831 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Information requirements related to new energy technologies: NIOSH viewpoint. Osheroff BJ; Bridbord K Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1979 Dec; 40(12):1126-30. PubMed ID: 583458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Time to rethink about energy. Watt KE Lakartidningen; 1972 May; 69(23):2834-6. PubMed ID: 5043076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Distinguishing government's responsibility in rationing public and private medical resources. Blumstein JF Tex Law Rev; 1982 May; 60(5):899-918. PubMed ID: 11650651 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Divided loyalties of health risk management. Katz DM Natl Underwrit Life Health; 1984 Aug; 88(32):4, 6. PubMed ID: 10278260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementing the Precautionary Principle: incorporating science, technology, fairness, and accountability in environmental, health, and safety decisions. Ashford NA Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2004; 17(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 15212207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The precautionary principle and political decision]. Barzach M Bull Acad Natl Med; 2000; 184(5):957-66; discussion 967-8. PubMed ID: 11077718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The ideal of community in the work of the President's Commission. Burt RA Cardozo Law Rev; 1984; 6(2):267-86. PubMed ID: 11651800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Protecting the unconceived: nonexistence, avoidability, and reproductive technology. Peters PG Ariz Law Rev; 1989; 31(3):487-548. PubMed ID: 11659319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The regulation of genetic engineering. Breyer S; Zeckhauser R Man Med; 1975; 1(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 12083123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Information requirements of the Department of Energy. Shepherd GR Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1979 Dec; 40(12):1114-8. PubMed ID: 539551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Setting limits: a realistic assignment for the Medicare program? Kinney ED St Louis Univ Law J; 1989; 33(3):631-70. PubMed ID: 11650405 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. What can health impact assessment add to comparative risk assessment in decision-making? Dora C Bull World Health Organ; 2003; 81(6):460. PubMed ID: 12894333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Can government place a value on saving a human life? Kirschten D Natl J (Wash); 1979 Feb; 11(7):252-5. PubMed ID: 10308792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks. Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Protection against toxic rocket fuels. Frierson WB Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1968; 29(5):456-60. PubMed ID: 5727083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Energy needs of the nation and the cost in terms of pollution. Ramey JT Fed Proc; 1972; 31(6):1559-68. PubMed ID: 4663364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]