These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5399780)
61. An evaluation of clinical trial designs that randomize composite units rather than individual patients. Simon R Experientia Suppl; 1982; 41():318-26. PubMed ID: 6958521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. Falsifying falsifications: the most critical task of theoreticians in biology. de Grey AD Med Hypotheses; 2004; 62(6):1012-20. PubMed ID: 15142666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Clinical biostatistics. XXXVII. Demeaned errors, confidence games, nonplussed minuses, inefficient coefficients, and other statistical disruptions of scientific communication. Feinstein AR Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1976 Nov; 20(5):617-31. PubMed ID: 985637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. On the modification of random fluctuations by a target-seeking process utilising random energies. Musès C Int J Biomed Comput; 1970 Jan; 1(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 5527693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. What are "significant figures"? Gelfand MD Am J Gastroenterol; 1990 Jul; 85(7):897-8. PubMed ID: 2371991 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. An analysis of the errors in certain anthropometric measurements. Munro A; Joffe A; Ward JS; Wyndham CH; Fleming PW Int Z Angew Physiol; 1966 Nov; 23(2):93-106. PubMed ID: 5998732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Improvements in the prediction of protein backbone topography by reduction of statistical errors. Maxfield FR; Scheraga HA Biochemistry; 1979 Feb; 18(4):697-704. PubMed ID: 217422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Reply to Slater-Hammel's note on vulgar errors. II. McDavid R Res Q; 1969 May; 40(2):443. PubMed ID: 5255584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. [A matrix expression for the calculation of the cross product difference]. Gai XL Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1987 Mar; 21(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 3652856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. [VARIOUS METHODS OF EVALUATING THE DIFFERENCE OF TWO VARIABLES]. REISENAUER R Cas Lek Cesk; 1965 May; 104():486-92. PubMed ID: 14344739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. REJECTION OF OBSERVATIONS. KANNER O Am J Clin Pathol; 1964 Jun; 41():626-7. PubMed ID: 14183053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. [Statistical methods in biological experiments]. Z Med Isotopenforsch Deren Grenzgeb; 1957 Nov; 1(2):180-6 contd. PubMed ID: 13531486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. Testing monotonicity of dosage-effect relationship by Mosteller's test and its sequential modification. Lienert GA; Sarris V Methods Inf Med; 1968 Oct; 7(4):236-9. PubMed ID: 5712910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Some comments on "The use and misuse of the chi-square test". PASTORE N Psychol Bull; 1950 Jul; 47(4):338-40. PubMed ID: 15440993 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. Further discussion of the use and misuse of the chi-square test. LEWIS D; BURKE CJ Psychol Bull; 1950 Jul; 47(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 15440995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. The misuse of chi-square a reply to Lewis and Burke. PETERS CC Psychol Bull; 1950 Jul; 47(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 15440992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. [Demonstration of the taxonomic value of rare attributes using correlation coefficient properties]. Tamarin PV Zh Obshch Biol; 1973; 34(2):264-74. PubMed ID: 4704389 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Tempest in a p-pot? Feinstein AR Hypertension; 1985; 7(3 Pt 1):313-8. PubMed ID: 3997217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]