These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5404457)

  • 1. Force-contingent reinforcement in instrumental conditioning and extinction in children: a test of the frustration-drive hypothesis.
    Blixt S; Ley R
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1969 Oct; 69(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 5404457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Frustration and secondary reinforcement concepts as applied to human instrumental conditioning and extinction.
    Longstreth LE
    Psychol Monogr; 1966; 80(11):1-29. PubMed ID: 5970214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of positive and negative force-contingent reinforcement on the frustration effect in humans.
    Ditkoff G; Ley R
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 May; 102(5):818-23. PubMed ID: 4847737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DIFFERENTIAL CONDITIONING, EXTINCTION, AND SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT.
    BLACK RW
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Jan; 69():67-74. PubMed ID: 14256251
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SELECTIVE LEARNING IN SEVERELY RETARDED CHILDREN AS A FUNCTION OF DIFFERENTIAL REACTION TO NONREWARD.
    SEMLER IJ
    Child Dev; 1965 Mar; 36():143-52. PubMed ID: 14296783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. EXTENDED TRAINING EXTINCTION EFFECT UNDER MASSED AND SPACED EXTINCTION TRAILS.
    BIRCH D
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Sep; 70():315-22. PubMed ID: 14343261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Frustration considerations of the small-trials partial reinforcement effect: experience with nonreward and intertrial reinforcement.
    Brooks CI
    J Exp Psychol; 1971 Aug; 89(2):362-71. PubMed ID: 5567141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of noncontingent partial reinforcement on the resistance to extinction of a runway response.
    Trapold MA; Doren DG
    J Exp Psychol; 1966 Mar; 71(3):429-31. PubMed ID: 5908826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of intertrial reinforcement on resistance to extinction following extended training.
    Black RW; Spence KW
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Dec; 70(6):559-63. PubMed ID: 5839508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Partial reinforcement effects within subject and between subjects.
    Amsel A; Rashotte ME; Mackinnon JR
    Psychol Monogr; 1966; 80(20):1-39. PubMed ID: 5971463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT IN CHILDREN AS A FUNCTION OF CONDITIONING ASSOCIATIONS AND EXTINCTION PERCENTAGES.
    MYERS JL; MYERS NA
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Dec; 68():611-2. PubMed ID: 14241096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Goal-box experience and partial reinforcement runway effects in the rat.
    Rosen AJ; Freedman PE
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1971 Jul; 76(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 5571301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of exposure to an aggressive model and "frustration" on children's aggressive behavior.
    Kuhn DZ; Madsen CH; Becker WC
    Child Dev; 1967 Sep; 38(3):739-45. PubMed ID: 6049637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. EFFECTS OF AMOBARBITAL ON EXTINCTION OF AN INSTRUMENTAL RESPONSE IN RATS.
    STRETCH R; HOUSTON M; JENKINS A
    Nature; 1964 Feb; 201():472-4. PubMed ID: 14164617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CUE AND SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT EFFECTS WITH CHILDREN.
    SIDOWSKI JB; KASS N; WILSON H
    J Exp Psychol; 1965 Apr; 69():340-2. PubMed ID: 14286301
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Secondary reinforcement in children as a function of conditioning associations, extinction percentages, and stimulus types.
    MYERS JL; MYERS NA
    J Exp Psychol; 1963 May; 65():455-9. PubMed ID: 13936959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resistance to extinction and frustration in retarded and nonretarded children.
    Viney LL; Clarke AM; Lord J
    Am J Ment Defic; 1973 Nov; 78(3):308-15. PubMed ID: 4769174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PARTIAL REINFORCEMENT EFFECT AND EXTINCTION AS A FUNCTION OF FRUSTRATION AND INTERFERING RESPONSES.
    LONGSTRETH LE
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Jun; 67():581-6. PubMed ID: 14155422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PARTIAL-REINFORCEMENT EXTINCTION EFFECT AS A FUNCTION OF SIZE OF GOAL BOX.
    KIRKPATRICK DR; PAVLIK WB; REYNOLDS WF
    J Exp Psychol; 1964 Nov; 68():515-6. PubMed ID: 14212139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF CLASSICAL AND INSTRUMENTAL APPETITIVE CONDITIONING.
    WEISMAN RG
    Am J Psychol; 1965 Sep; 78():423-31. PubMed ID: 14344084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.