These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 540654)

  • 1. Side-effects of interference with speech by noise.
    Jones D; Broadbent D
    Ergonomics; 1979 Sep; 22(9):1073-81. PubMed ID: 540654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of meaningful irrelevant speech and road traffic noise on teachers' attention, episodic and semantic memory.
    Enmarker I
    Scand J Psychol; 2004 Nov; 45(5):393-405. PubMed ID: 15535808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of road traffic noise and irrelevant speech on children's reading and mathematical performance.
    Ljung R; Sörqvist P; Hygge S
    Noise Health; 2009; 11(45):194-8. PubMed ID: 19805928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The effect of low frequency noise on human mental performance].
    Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska M; Dudarewicz A; Waszkowska M; Szymczak W; Kameduła M; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
    Med Pr; 2004; 55(1):63-74. PubMed ID: 15156769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of speech on proofreading: can task-engagement manipulations shield against distraction?
    Halin N; Marsh JE; Haga A; Holmgren M; Sörqvist P
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2014 Mar; 20(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 24099531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term exposure to noise impairs cortical sound processing and attention control.
    Kujala T; Shtyrov Y; Winkler I; Saher M; Tervaniemi M; Sallinen M; Teder-Sälejärvi W; Alho K; Reinikainen K; Näätänen R
    Psychophysiology; 2004 Nov; 41(6):875-81. PubMed ID: 15563340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noise exposure, monitoring and tracking performance as a function of signal bias and task priority.
    Loeb M; Jones PD
    Ergonomics; 1978 Apr; 21(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 668668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech skill learning of persons who stutter and fluent speakers under single and dual task conditions.
    Smits-Bandstra S; De Nil L
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2009 Jan; 23(1):38-57. PubMed ID: 19148812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the effort expended to understand speech in noise using a dual-task paradigm: the effects of providing visual speech cues.
    Fraser S; Gagné JP; Alepins M; Dubois P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 53(1):18-33. PubMed ID: 19635945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of a headset leakage on speech intelligibility in helicopter noise.
    Wagstaff AS; Tvete O; Ludvigsen B
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1996 Nov; 67(11):1034-8. PubMed ID: 8908340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The irrelevant speech effect and the level of interference in aging.
    Van Gerven PW; Meijer WA; Vermeeren A; Vuurman EF; Jolles J
    Exp Aging Res; 2007; 33(3):323-39. PubMed ID: 17497373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources.
    Ricketts TA; Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):763-73. PubMed ID: 17086085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech perception abilities of adults with dyslexia: is there any evidence for a true deficit?
    Hazan V; Messaoud-Galusi S; Rosen S; Nouwens S; Shakespeare B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Dec; 52(6):1510-29. PubMed ID: 19635940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The present state of research on the effects of noise: are we asking the right questions?
    Loeb M
    J Aud Res; 1981 Apr; 21(2):93-104. PubMed ID: 6763609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detrimental noise effects on brain's speech functions.
    Kujala T; Brattico E
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Jul; 81(3):135-43. PubMed ID: 19482230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combined effects of noise and vibration on human tracking performance and response time.
    Sommer HC; Harris CS
    Aerosp Med; 1973 Mar; 44(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 4690456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of speech and speech intelligibility on task performance.
    Venetjoki N; Kaarlela-Tuomaala A; Keskinen E; Hongisto V
    Ergonomics; 2006 Sep; 49(11):1068-91. PubMed ID: 16950722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cortical mechanisms of speech perception in noise.
    Wong PC; Uppunda AK; Parrish TB; Dhar S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Aug; 51(4):1026-41. PubMed ID: 18658069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.