These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Pelvic measurements and outcome of labour. Jennings EE Radiography; 1982 Sep; 48(573):190-2. PubMed ID: 7146354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Pelvimetry by ultrasound in late pregnancy. Pystynen P; Ylöstalo P; Järvinen PA Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1967; 56(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 6065320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Radiologic cephalopelvimetry. Analysis of 111 cases]. Muñúzuri Victoria J; Rodríguez Macías D; Lozano Guevara R Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1975 Oct; 38(228):263-9. PubMed ID: 1205172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Radiographic study in breech labor]. Martínez LA Acta Obstet Ginecol Hisp Lusit Suppl; 1973 Apr; ():3-95. PubMed ID: 4517769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Pelvimetry with image intensifier camera. A low radiation dose method. Lauteala I Acta Radiol Suppl; 1974; 341():1-132. PubMed ID: 4526364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Results of intra-uterine X-ray cephalometry in breech presentation. Perlmann T S Afr Med J; 1973 Jul; 47(29):1308-11. PubMed ID: 4720612 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [From the contracted pelvis to cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD)]. Ohima N Sanfujinka No Jissai; 1971 Feb; 20(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 4927285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Indication for cesarean section: determination of C.P.D]. Takei J Sanfujinka No Jissai; 1972 Jan; 21(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 5067258 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Use of screens with high reinforcement factor in obstetrico-gynecological radiodiagnosis]. De Simoni M; Pertosa M; Tosi G Radiol Med; 1978 Oct; 64(10):1162-4. PubMed ID: 734189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Present orientations in the radiologic study of feto-pelvic relations]. Tetti A; Temporelli A Minerva Radiol; 1967 Sep; 12(9):310-20. PubMed ID: 5615837 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Usefulness of fetal roentgenography in the estimation of the size of the head in pelvic presentation]. MIELNIK J Ginekol Pol; 1962; 33():241-9. PubMed ID: 14473574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Approach to cephalopelvic disproportion (C.P.D.) by ultrasonic tomography]. Sekiba K; Kobayashi S; Uno A; Yamamoto F; Yoshida H Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1971 Oct; 23(10):989-98. PubMed ID: 5169271 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The radiation hazard in radiography of the female abdomen and pelvis. Reekie D; Davison M; Davidson JK Br J Radiol; 1967 Nov; 40(479):849-54. PubMed ID: 6057669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The need for accuracy in cephalopelvimetry. SCHWARZ GS Radiology; 1955 Jun; 64(6):874-6. PubMed ID: 14385067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Roentgenographic study of the inclination of the lateral pelvic wall and the interacetabular distance in normal adult pelves. MILCH RA J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1954 Jun; 36-A(3):533-8. PubMed ID: 13163085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of radiology in obstetrics. HARTLEY JB Br J Clin Pract; 1957 Jan; 11(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 13396124 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]