BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5407654)

  • 1. The private sector. Alternative to federal funding of biomedical research.
    Newton G
    Dev Psychobiol; 1969; 2(2):55. PubMed ID: 5407654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Foundations funding biomedical bodies 'should shift focus'.
    Lehrman S
    Nature; 1996 Sep; 383(6596):112. PubMed ID: 8774872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Guide to grant applications.
    Weinstein RD; Marshall-Rhodes S; Smith QW
    Radiol Technol; 1981; 52(4):397-408. PubMed ID: 7220855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The challenge of funding research on rare malignancies.
    Palkhivala A
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Nov; 103(22):1650-2. PubMed ID: 22025627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Private placements. Organizations plug gaps in federal research funding.
    Pallarito K
    Mod Healthc; 1998 Aug; 28(35):70. PubMed ID: 10182800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Science research and philanthropy. Government funding dominant.
    Greene S
    Nature; 1993 Aug; 364(6439):741-2. PubMed ID: 8355791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Government funding is up; private donations are down.
    AIDS Alert; 1999 Dec; 14(12):141-4. PubMed ID: 11366991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Foundation funding and chemical biology.
    McGovern V
    Nat Chem Biol; 2008 Sep; 4(9):519-22. PubMed ID: 18711375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. HIV/AIDS. The great funding surge.
    Cohen J
    Science; 2008 Jul; 321(5888):512-9. PubMed ID: 18653876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Private sector support of nursing research.
    Strickland OL; Burgess AW; Oberst MT; Kim HS
    Nurs Res; 1987; 36(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 3648701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How the US government can fund your company.
    Basu P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Apr; 22(4):482-6. PubMed ID: 15085814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NIH funding reform.
    Strauss JF
    Science; 2005 Aug; 309(5736):851. PubMed ID: 16081700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Funding for reproductive research: the status and the needs.
    Koblinsky MA; Jaffe FS; Greep RO
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1976; 8(5):212-25. PubMed ID: 976465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Seeking alternative research funding: problems for the young academic physician.
    Trigg ME
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1985; 48(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 3975265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Grantmanship: winning foundation funding.
    Wood JB
    Nurs Econ; 1986; 4(2):80-2, 88. PubMed ID: 3634198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. New rules propose greater scrutiny for NIH grant recipients.
    Dove A
    Nat Med; 2006 Jan; 12(1):5. PubMed ID: 16397535
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Taking the profit out of biomedical research tools.
    Flores MA
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Aug; 17(8):819-20. PubMed ID: 10429252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Addressing the decline in NIH pain research funding.
    Max MB
    J Pain; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1074-6. PubMed ID: 19038769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Foundations get behind the wheel of health reform.
    Pallarito K
    Mod Healthc; 1991 Jul; 21(26):22-5. PubMed ID: 10111425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Battle lines shift in stem-cell funding fight...as non-profit companies enter the fray.
    Smaglik P
    Nature; 2000 May; 405(6782):6. PubMed ID: 10811186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.