263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5407654)
1. The private sector. Alternative to federal funding of biomedical research.
Newton G
Dev Psychobiol; 1969; 2(2):55. PubMed ID: 5407654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Foundations funding biomedical bodies 'should shift focus'.
Lehrman S
Nature; 1996 Sep; 383(6596):112. PubMed ID: 8774872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Guide to grant applications.
Weinstein RD; Marshall-Rhodes S; Smith QW
Radiol Technol; 1981; 52(4):397-408. PubMed ID: 7220855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The challenge of funding research on rare malignancies.
Palkhivala A
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2011 Nov; 103(22):1650-2. PubMed ID: 22025627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Private placements. Organizations plug gaps in federal research funding.
Pallarito K
Mod Healthc; 1998 Aug; 28(35):70. PubMed ID: 10182800
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Science research and philanthropy. Government funding dominant.
Greene S
Nature; 1993 Aug; 364(6439):741-2. PubMed ID: 8355791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Government funding is up; private donations are down.
AIDS Alert; 1999 Dec; 14(12):141-4. PubMed ID: 11366991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Foundation funding and chemical biology.
McGovern V
Nat Chem Biol; 2008 Sep; 4(9):519-22. PubMed ID: 18711375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. HIV/AIDS. The great funding surge.
Cohen J
Science; 2008 Jul; 321(5888):512-9. PubMed ID: 18653876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Private sector support of nursing research.
Strickland OL; Burgess AW; Oberst MT; Kim HS
Nurs Res; 1987; 36(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 3648701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How the US government can fund your company.
Basu P
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Apr; 22(4):482-6. PubMed ID: 15085814
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. NIH funding reform.
Strauss JF
Science; 2005 Aug; 309(5736):851. PubMed ID: 16081700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Funding for reproductive research: the status and the needs.
Koblinsky MA; Jaffe FS; Greep RO
Fam Plann Perspect; 1976; 8(5):212-25. PubMed ID: 976465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Seeking alternative research funding: problems for the young academic physician.
Trigg ME
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1985; 48(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 3975265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Grantmanship: winning foundation funding.
Wood JB
Nurs Econ; 1986; 4(2):80-2, 88. PubMed ID: 3634198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. New rules propose greater scrutiny for NIH grant recipients.
Dove A
Nat Med; 2006 Jan; 12(1):5. PubMed ID: 16397535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Taking the profit out of biomedical research tools.
Flores MA
Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Aug; 17(8):819-20. PubMed ID: 10429252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Addressing the decline in NIH pain research funding.
Max MB
J Pain; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1074-6. PubMed ID: 19038769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Foundations get behind the wheel of health reform.
Pallarito K
Mod Healthc; 1991 Jul; 21(26):22-5. PubMed ID: 10111425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Battle lines shift in stem-cell funding fight...as non-profit companies enter the fray.
Smaglik P
Nature; 2000 May; 405(6782):6. PubMed ID: 10811186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]