These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 541133)
1. The relation between the Hypnotic Induction Profile and the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scales, forms A and C. Orne MT; Hilgard ER; Spiegel H; Spiegel D; Crawford HJ; Evans FJ; Orne EC; Frischholz EJ Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1979 Apr; 27(2):85-102. PubMed ID: 541133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The relationship between the Hypnotic Induction Profile and the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C: revisited. Frishholz EJ; Spiegel H; Tryon WW; Fisher S Am J Clin Hypn; 1981 Oct; 24(2):98-105. PubMed ID: 7340502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The eye roll sign and other scores of the Hypnotic Induction Profile (HIP) as related to the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C (SHSS:C): a critical discussion of a study by Frischholz and others. Hilgard ER Am J Clin Hypn; 1981 Oct; 24(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 7340501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Stanford Hypnotic Arm Levitation Induction and Test (SHALIT): a six-minute hypnotic induction and measurement scale. Hilgard ER; Crawford HJ; Wert A Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1979 Apr; 27(2):111-24. PubMed ID: 541129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The relation of self-reports of hypnotic depth in self-hypnosis to hypnotizability and imagery production. Kahn SP; Fromm E; Lombard LS; Sossi M Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1989 Oct; 37(4):290-304. PubMed ID: 2793270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Hypnotic Induction Profile and hypnotic susceptibility. Eliseo TS Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1974 Oct; 22(4):320-6. PubMed ID: 4416589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form C: manual and response booklet. Bowers KS Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1998 Jul; 46(3):250-68. PubMed ID: 9650438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A note of caution on the Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of hypnotic susceptibility: a brief communication. Cardeña E; Terhune DB Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2009 Apr; 57(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 19234968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Empirical assessment of Spiegel's Hypnotic Induction Profile and eye-roll hypothesis. Sheehan DV; Latta WD; Regina EG; Smith GM Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1979 Apr; 27(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 541128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The efficacy of the Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of hypnotic susceptibility: form C. Moran TE; Kurtz RM; Strube MJ Am J Clin Hypn; 2002; 44(3-4):221-30. PubMed ID: 11799536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) scale of hypnotic susceptibility: normative and comparative data. Bowers KS Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Jan; 41(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 8425774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The neural trance: a new look at hypnosis. Spiegel H Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2007 Oct; 55(4):387-410. PubMed ID: 17786657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Portuguese norms for the Waterloo-Stanford Group C (WSGC) scale of hypnotic susceptibility. Carvalho C; Kirsch I; Mazzoni G; Leal I Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2008 Jul; 56(3):295-305. PubMed ID: 18569140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The phenomenology of the experiences and the depth of hypnosis: comparison of direct and indirect induction techniques. Szabó C Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Jul; 41(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 8335421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing hypnotic responsiveness in a clinical setting: a multi-item clinical scale and its advantages over single-item scales. Hilgard JR; Hilgard ER Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1979 Apr; 27(2):134-50. PubMed ID: 541131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. An exploratory study of hypnotic capacity of schizophrenic and borderline patients in a clinical setting. Murray-Jobsis J Am J Clin Hypn; 1991 Jan; 33(3):150-60; discussion 161-71. PubMed ID: 2012006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Paired-associate learning and recall of high and low imagery words: moderating effects of hypnosis, hypnotic susceptibility level, and visualization abilities. Crawford HJ; Allen SN Am J Psychol; 1996; 109(3):353-72. PubMed ID: 8837407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of a multimodal image, the apple technique, to facilitate clinical hypnosis: a brief communication. Strauss BS Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1991 Jan; 39(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 2001894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Suggestibility or hypnosis: what do our scales really measure? Kirsch I Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1997 Jul; 45(3):212-25. PubMed ID: 9204635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]