These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5418161)
1. Incidence of pregnancy with the IUD in private practice in New Orleans. Doyle LL; Barclay DL; Winkel C J La State Med Soc; 1970 Feb; 122(2):45-7. PubMed ID: 5418161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception. Prescrire Int; 2009 Jun; 18(101):125-30. PubMed ID: 19637436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intrauterine contraceptive devices: a comparison between their use in indigent and private patients. Willson JR; Ledger WJ; Lowell J Obstet Gynecol; 1967 Jan; 29(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 6017946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?]. Forrest JD Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Analysis of 52 pregnancies with intrauterine devices]. Olivas Mendoza G; Hernández JG; Noriega Prieto JS; Castro Velarde RI; Thomas Del Río G; Inda Silva A Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1981 Apr; 49(294):255-62. PubMed ID: 7327423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intrauterine devices. Family Planning Association of New South Wales Fam Plann Inf Serv; 1978 Dec; 1(4):1-50. PubMed ID: 12335595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [IUD insertion during cesarean section and its most frequent complications]. Alvarez Pelayo J; Borbolla Sala ME Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1994 Nov; 62():330-5. PubMed ID: 7821830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Advantages and disadvantages of IUD insertion immediately after abortion]. Matrljan I; Randić L Jugosl Ginekol Opstet; 1982; 22(1-2):43-5. PubMed ID: 7132427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term use of intrauterine devices. Novak MK; Andolsek L; Balogh SA; Waszak CS IPPF Med Bull; 1988 Feb; 22(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 12281431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intrauterine devices (IUDs) and their complications (clinical evaluation of 2013 women with IUD in-situ). Ayhan A; Ozalp S; Aslan A Acta Reprod Turc; 1982 Oct; 4(2):34-8. PubMed ID: 12267258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contraceptive effectiveness of immediate compared with delayed insertion of intrauterine devices after abortion: a decision analysis. Reeves MF; Smith KJ; Creinin MD Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jun; 109(6):1286-94. PubMed ID: 17540799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical practice guideline for cesarean section due to cephalopelvic disproportion. Chittiphavorn S; Pinjaroen S; Suwanrath C; Soonthornpun K J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Jun; 89(6):735-40. PubMed ID: 16850670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An audit of intrauterine device usage and outcome in general practice. Presley AP Practitioner; 1980 Oct; 224(1348):1089-91. PubMed ID: 7220438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incidence of actinomycosis associated with intrauterine devices. Chatwani A; Amin-Hanjani S J Reprod Med; 1994 Aug; 39(8):585-7. PubMed ID: 7996521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Study of side-effects of Cu-T as intra-uterine contraceptive device in post medical termination of pregnancy and interval cases. Das CR; Pradhan G J Indian Med Assoc; 1995 Oct; 93(10):375-6. PubMed ID: 9053409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]