These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 543439)

  • 1. The repetition effect in time judgments is not a function of the intensity of the stimulus defining the interval: implications for an arousal theory.
    Allen DA; Hicks RE
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1979 May; 43(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 543439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extraversion and auditory sensitivity to high and low frequency.
    Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Jun; 38(3):875-9. PubMed ID: 4842444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How does the pitch and pattern of a signal affect auditory arousal thresholds?
    Bruck D; Ball M; Thomas I; Rouillard V
    J Sleep Res; 2009 Jun; 18(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 19302343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The startle response to acoustic stimuli near startle threshold: effects of stimulus rise and fall time, duration, and intensity.
    Blumenthal TD
    Psychophysiology; 1988 Sep; 25(5):607-11. PubMed ID: 3186888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stimulus intensity and the perception of duration.
    Matthews WJ; Stewart N; Wearden JH
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):303-13. PubMed ID: 20731508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus spacing effects in duration perception are larger for auditory stimuli: data and a model.
    Penney TB; Brown GD; Wong JK
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Mar; 147():97-104. PubMed ID: 23978665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of acoustic reflex and behavioral thresholds as a function of stimulus frequency and duration.
    Barry SJ; Resnick SB
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 2(2):35-7. PubMed ID: 977428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audiovisual temporal order judgments.
    Zampini M; Shore DI; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Sep; 152(2):198-210. PubMed ID: 12879178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The repetition effect in judgments of temporal duration across minutes, days, and months.
    Hicks RE; Allen DA
    Am J Psychol; 1979 Jun; 92(2):323-33. PubMed ID: 474836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Psychodiagnostic possibilities of an external rhythm generator on the psychic tempo].
    Kühne GE; Krell D; Knorr W
    Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1982 Jan; 34(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 7079413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concurrent emotional pictures modulate temporal order judgments of spatially separated audio-tactile stimuli.
    Jia L; Shi Z; Zang X; Müller HJ
    Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 1537():156-63. PubMed ID: 24041776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory texture perception.
    Lederman SJ
    Perception; 1979; 8(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 432084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus duration has little effect on auditory, visual and audiovisual temporal order judgement.
    Tiippana K; Salmela VR
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 May; 236(5):1273-1282. PubMed ID: 29484457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multisensory temporal order judgments: the role of hemispheric redundancy.
    Zampini M; Shore DI; Spence C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2003 Oct; 50(1-2):165-80. PubMed ID: 14511844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory extinction and spatio-temporal order judgment in patients with left- and right-hemisphere lesions.
    Witte C; Grube M; Cramon DY; Rübsamen R
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Apr; 50(5):892-903. PubMed ID: 22321955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differential fetal auditory reactiveness as a function of stimulus characteristics and state.
    Lecanuet JP; Granier-Deferre C; Busnel MC
    Semin Perinatol; 1989 Oct; 13(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 2814528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chronostasis without voluntary action.
    Alexander I; Thilo KV; Cowey A; Walsh V
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Feb; 161(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 15586278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Audiotactile temporal order judgments.
    Zampini M; Brown T; Shore DI; Maravita A; Röder B; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Mar; 118(3):277-91. PubMed ID: 15698825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relative contribution of expectancy and immediate arousal to the facilitatory effect of an auditory accessory stimulus.
    Del-Fava F; Ribeiro-do-Valle LE
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2004 Aug; 37(8):1161-74. PubMed ID: 15273817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of stimulus frequency, spectrum, duration, and location on temporal order judgment thresholds: distribution analysis.
    Fostick L; Lifshitz-Ben-Basat A; Babkoff H
    Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):968-976. PubMed ID: 28887686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.