These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 543574)
21. Automated analysis of cervical specimens using the T.A.S. van Driel-Kulker AM; Meyer F; Ploem JS Microsc Acta Suppl; 1980; Suppl 4():73-81. PubMed ID: 6931280 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Telecytology: intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of cervical-vaginal smears. Alli PM; Ollayos CW; Thompson LD; Kapadia I; Butler DR; Williams BH; Rosenthal DL; O'leary TJ Hum Pathol; 2001 Dec; 32(12):1318-22. PubMed ID: 11774163 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cytomorphologic results of preparation experiments for monolayer deposition of cervical material. Höffken H; Otto K; Soost HJ J Histochem Cytochem; 1979 Jan; 27(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 86561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Optimization of the binding of dissociated exfoliated cervico-vaginal cells to glass microscope slides. Leif RC; Ingram D; Clay C; Bobbitt D; Gaddis R; Leif SB; Nordqvist S J Histochem Cytochem; 1977 Jul; 25(7):538-43. PubMed ID: 894002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A preparation technique for exfoliated and aspirated cells allowing different staining procedures. van Driel-Kulker AM; Ploem-Zaaijer JJ; van der Zwan-van der Zwan M; Tanke HJ Anal Quant Cytol; 1980 Dec; 2(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 6162408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Direct intrauterine sampling with Uterobrush: cell preparation by the "flicked" method. Fujihara A; Norimatsu Y; Kobayashi TK; Iwanari O; Nagaoka S Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Jul; 34(7):486-90. PubMed ID: 16783769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Improvement of pretreatment and input preparations of the cellular specimens for the pattern recognition system]. Matozaki T Iyodenshi To Seitai Kogaku; 1983 Feb; 21(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 6632345 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The cervical smear. The cytopathologist's point of view. Drake M Aust Fam Physician; 1990 May; 19(5):695-7. PubMed ID: 2346422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Determination of a significant cell count for positive diagnosis in gynecologic suspension preparations and possible consequences for the analysis of automated preparations]. Schwarz G; Schwarz M Microsc Acta Suppl; 1983; 6():21-7. PubMed ID: 6353174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Proteomic analysis of high-grade dysplastic cervical cells obtained from ThinPrep slides using laser capture microdissection and mass spectrometry. Gu Y; Wu SL; Meyer JL; Hancock WS; Burg LJ; Linder J; Hanlon DW; Karger BL J Proteome Res; 2007 Nov; 6(11):4256-68. PubMed ID: 17902640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of different temperatures for drying cervical mucus smear on their crystallisation pattern: a short report. Onemu SO Afr J Reprod Health; 2002 Apr; 6(1):107-8. PubMed ID: 12476734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [High resolution cell recognition and flow cytometry as means to automated cytodiagnosis]. Sprenger E Microsc Acta Suppl; 1983; 6():79-89. PubMed ID: 6578408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Rapid, high throughput determination of cervical cytology specimen adequacy using a capillary-based cytometer. Polina R; Sturgis C; Patterson J; Patterson BK Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2008 Mar; 74(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 18044721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Separation and concentration of phytoplankton populations using centrifugal elutriation. Pomponi SA; Cucci TL Cytometry; 1989 Sep; 10(5):580-6. PubMed ID: 2776574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Automation in cervical cancer screening. Part 1: fixed cell scanning systems. Husain OA; Tucker JH; Roberts BA Biomed Eng; 1976 May; 11(5):161-6. PubMed ID: 945084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of filtration on the loss of abnormal cervical cells in specimen preparation for automated cytology. Rosenthal DL; Leibel J; Meyer DJ; Woods SD; McLatchie C; Suffin SC; Castleman KR Anal Quant Cytol; 1983 Dec; 5(4):236-40. PubMed ID: 6670791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Automated cytology. A symposium by correspondence. Chapter V. Requirements of preparation and sample collection problems. Acta Cytol; 1971; 15(3):216-35. PubMed ID: 4104210 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Studies on the distribution of abnormal cells in cytologic preparations. V. The gradient of cell deposition on slides. Rubio CA; Kock Y Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Jun; 57(6):754-8. PubMed ID: 7231829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Studies on the manufacture of hematological and cytological specimens using the centrifugation technic]. Aurich G; Schorcht E; Plenert W Folia Haematol Int Mag Klin Morphol Blutforsch; 1977; 104(2):229-36. PubMed ID: 69586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Why we prefer the thin layer technique to conventional Pap smears. A double-blind study of 473 specimens]. Boman F; Farré I; Farine MO; Leroy JL; Gauthier A; Querleu D; Vacher-Lavenu MC Clin Exp Pathol; 1999; 47(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 10398579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]