103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5440276)
1. Simplified estimation of normal ranges from routine laboratory data.
Becktel JM
Clin Chim Acta; 1970 Apr; 28(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 5440276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of a transformation method for estimation of normal range.
Reed AH; Wu GT
Clin Chem; 1974 May; 20(5):576-81. PubMed ID: 4826952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A computer program for estimation of reference percentile values in laboratory data.
Rossing RG; Hatcher WE
Comput Programs Biomed; 1979 Jan; 9(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 365438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of a desk-top computer for routine calculations in a clinical radioisotope laboratory.
Roos P
Nucl Med (Stuttg); 1969 Jul; 8(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 5346130
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of laboratory error on the normal range: a Bayesian model.
Krause RD; Anand VD; Gruemer HD; Willke TA
Clin Chem; 1975 Mar; 21(3):321-4. PubMed ID: 1112041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer analysis of quality control data.
Conn RB; Best ML; Anido V; Crain FD
Am J Clin Pathol; 1967 Oct; 48(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 6053932
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An interpretation of normal ranges based on a new concept "individual difference quotient" of clinical laboratory data.
Tango T
Med Inform (Lond); 1981; 6(3):161-74. PubMed ID: 7289681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Problems of modern diagnosis].
Immich H; Kübler W; Oette K; Schumacher K
Methods Inf Med; 1967 Jan; 6(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 6043323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. An algorithm for the selection of proper group intervals for histograms representing clinical laboratory data.
Martin HF; Gudzinowicz BJ; Driscoll JL
Am J Clin Pathol; 1975 Sep; 64(3):327-34. PubMed ID: 1163484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality control techniques in laboratory services.
Whitehead TP
Br Med Bull; 1974 Sep; 30(3):237-42. PubMed ID: 4458900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Several aspects of statistical analysis of biological measurements].
Ducimetiere P; Lazar P
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1971; 29(4):275-7. PubMed ID: 4943343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [How to Interpret Data of Routine Laboratory Tests (Basic Laboratory Tests)--Various Methods to Interpret Routine Laboratory Data in 3 Clinical Laboratory Facilities--A Method at Shinshu University Hospital].
Sugano M; Tozuka M; Honda T
Rinsho Byori; 2015 Sep; 63(9):1064-70. PubMed ID: 26731895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A simple method for "reference range" estimation from routine laboratory data.
Chu SY; Cheung P; Turkington VE
Clin Biochem; 1976 Aug; 9(4):198-202. PubMed ID: 954183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mathematics, computers, and the doctor.
Healy MJ
Br Med J; 1968 Jan; 1(5586):243-5. PubMed ID: 5634805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical biostatistics XXXI. On the sensitivity, specificity, and discrimination of diagnostic tests.
Feinstein AR
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1975 Jan; 17(1):104-16. PubMed ID: 1122664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Decision theory for clinicians: uses and misuses of clinical tests.
Applegate WB
South Med J; 1981 Apr; 74(4):468-73. PubMed ID: 7221664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Techniques of orthomolecular diagnosis.
Robinson AB; Pauling L
Clin Chem; 1974 Aug; 20(8):961-5. PubMed ID: 4854609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. MULTI-DIMENSIONAL LINEAR REGRESSION METHOD FOR ELECTROCARDIOGRAM ANALYSIS.
YOUNG TY
Biomed Sci Instrum; 1963; 1():335-9. PubMed ID: 14174500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of intra- and inter-individual variation on distributions of single measurements.
Harris EK; DeMets DL
Clin Chem; 1972 Mar; 18(3):244-9. PubMed ID: 5020819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. ON-LINE DIGITAL COMPUTER USED IN BIOLOGICAL EXPERIMENTS AND MODELING.
STARK L; SANDBERG AA; STANTEN S; WILLIS PA; DICKSON JF
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1964 Jul; 115():738-62. PubMed ID: 14214048
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
