These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 544399)

  • 21. [Speech rehabilitation in the laryngectomized patient].
    Pérez Gómez J; Pérez Suárez MD; Hernández García AC
    Rev Enferm; 1987 Dec; 10(112):38-9. PubMed ID: 3438676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The pharyngoesophageal segment in laryngectomees--videoradiographic, acoustic, and voice quality perceptual data.
    Lundström E; Hammarberg B; Munck-Wikland E; Edsborg N
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2008; 33(3):115-25. PubMed ID: 18608876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Perceptual comparison of neoglottal, oesophageal and normal speech.
    Ainsworth WA; Singh W
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1992; 44(6):297-307. PubMed ID: 1286842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effects of a total laryngectomy on speech breathing.
    Bohnenkamp TA
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Jun; 16(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 18475071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Analysis of qualitative voice and speech quality judgments after total laryngectomy].
    Miani C; Bertino G; Bellomo A; Staffieri A
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1998 Jun; 18(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 9926447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Tongue strength. Part II: in artificial alaryngeal speech.
    Hartman DE; Dworkin JP; Keith RL
    Laryngoscope; 1980 May; 90(5 Pt 1):867-70. PubMed ID: 7374318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Characteristics of voicing source waveforms produced by esophageal and tracheoesophageal speakers.
    Qi Y; Weinberg B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1995 Jun; 38(3):536-48. PubMed ID: 7674645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Airway resistance during esophageal phonation.
    Weinberg B; Horii Y; Blom E; Singer M
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1982 May; 47(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 7176598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Enhancement of female esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech.
    Qi Y; Weinberg B; Bi N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Nov; 98(5 Pt 1):2461-5. PubMed ID: 7593930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pitch perturbation measures of voice production of laryngectomees after the Amatsu tracheoesophageal shunt operation.
    Kinishi M; Amatsu M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1986; 13(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 3741270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Utterance and pause lengths and frequencies in oral readings by superior esophageal speakers and by normal speakers.
    Horii Y
    Comput Biomed Res; 1983 Oct; 16(5):446-53. PubMed ID: 6627913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Effect of social and psychic factors in laryngectomized patients on the rehabilitation of substitute communication ability].
    Pruszewicz A; Obrebowski A; Borucińska-Tyczyńsku J
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1977; 31(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 896215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Voice and speech after laryngectomy.
    Stajner-Katusić S; Horga D; Musura M; Globlek D
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):195-203. PubMed ID: 16428237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An acoustical and perceptual study of vowels produced by alaryngeal speakers of Cantonese.
    Ng ML; Chu R
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 19299898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. CLINICAL MEASUREMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL SPEECH. 3. PERFORMANCE OF NON-BIASED GROUPS.
    BERLIN CI
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1965 May; 30():174-83. PubMed ID: 14281430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. AIR INTAKE AND USAGE IN ESOPHAGEAL SPEECH.
    ISSHIKI N; SNIDECOR JC
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1965 Jun; 59():559-74. PubMed ID: 14343096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The role of sex in voice restoration and emotional functioning after laryngectomy].
    Keszte J; Wollbrück D; Meyer A; Fuchs M; Meister E; Pabst F; Oeken J; Schock J; Wulke C; Singer S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2012 Apr; 91(4):240-6. PubMed ID: 22318463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [PROPOSAL OF A NEW METHOD FOR OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF THE DEGREE OF REEDUCATION WITH ESOPHAGEAL VOICE OF LARYNGECTOMIZED SUBJECTS].
    FIORI-RATTI L; COLLATINA S; CATASTA GM
    Valsalva; 1965 Feb; 41():1-11. PubMed ID: 14309317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Behavior of the cricopharyngeal segment during esophageal phonation in laryngectomized patients.
    Aguiar-Ricz L; Dantas RO; Ricz H; Gielow I; Mamede RC; Perdoná GC
    J Voice; 2007 Mar; 21(2):248-56. PubMed ID: 16504467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Relevance of psychosocial factors in speech rehabilitation after laryngectomy].
    Singer S; Fuchs M; Dietz A; Klemm E; Kienast U; Meyer A; Oeken J; Täschner R; Wulke C; Schwarz R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2007 Dec; 86(12):867-74. PubMed ID: 17713877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.