These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 544582)

  • 1. Absorbed dose measurements using parallel plate polystyrene ionization chambers in polystyrene phantoms.
    Holt JG; Buffa A; Perry DJ; Ma IC; McDonald JC
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1979; 5(11-12):2031-8. PubMed ID: 544582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparisons of electron beam dose measurements in water and polystyrene using various dosimeters.
    Kase KR; Adler GJ; Bjärngard BE
    Med Phys; 1982; 9(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 6804767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Absorbed dose comparison among commercial ionization chambers in polystyrene and acrylic phantoms.
    Kubo H; Cheng P
    Med Phys; 1988; 15(2):269-72. PubMed ID: 3273884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Results of photon absorbed-dose measurements using the AAPM TG-21 protocol for accelerating potentials up to 26 MV.
    Hazle JD; Kirby TH; Gastorf RJ; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(6):1234-6. PubMed ID: 1753909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Study of the influence of phantom material and size on the calibration of ionization chambers in terms of absorbed dose to water.
    Arib M; Medjadj T; Boudouma Y
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 7(3):55-64. PubMed ID: 17533342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of parallel-plate ionization chambers in reference dosimetry of NOVAC and LIAC
    Scalchi P; Ciccotelli A; Felici G; Petrucci A; Massafra R; Piazzi V; D'Avenia P; Cavagnetto F; Cattani F; Romagnoli R; Soriani A
    Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):321-332. PubMed ID: 28102948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The characterization of the Advanced Markus ionization chamber for use in reference electron dosimetry in the UK.
    Pearce J; Thomas R; Dusautoy A
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(3):473-83. PubMed ID: 16424576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of the ferrous sulphate dosimeter for intercomparison of absorbed dose from electron beams.
    Chen WL; Chang SC
    Med Phys; 1984; 11(3):335-7. PubMed ID: 6429501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
    Tailor RC; Hanson WF
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The calibration of parallel-plate electron ionization chambers at NPL for use with the IPEM 2003 code of practice: summary data.
    Bass G; Thomas R; Pearce J
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(8):N115-24. PubMed ID: 19305037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Polarity effect for various ionization chambers with multiple irradiation conditions in electron beams.
    Aget H; Rosenwald JC
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 2008173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relative electron beam measurements: scaling depths in clear polystyrene to equivalent depths in water.
    Ten Haken RK; Fraass BA
    Med Phys; 1987; 14(3):410-3. PubMed ID: 3600533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity of transition-zone dosimetry at high atomic number interfaces in megavoltage photon beams.
    Das IJ; Kase KR; Meigooni AS; Khan FM; Werner BL
    Med Phys; 1990; 17(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 2106608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electron backscatter corrections for parallel-plate chambers.
    Hunt MA; Kutcher GJ; Buffa A
    Med Phys; 1988; 15(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 3127670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using ion chambers with wedge-shaped absorbers for electron energy measurements.
    Johnsen SW
    Med Phys; 1986; 13(2):257-8. PubMed ID: 3702824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors for converting dose measured in polystyrene phantoms to dose reported in water phantoms for incident proton beams.
    Moyers MF; Vatnitsky AS; Vatnitsky SM
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5799-806. PubMed ID: 21992394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "Nonisolated-sensor" solid polystyrene absorbed dose measurements.
    Zeitz L; Laughlin JS
    Med Phys; 1982; 9(5):763-8. PubMed ID: 7155081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comments on: "Absorbed Dose Comparison Among Commercial Ionization Chambers in Polystyrene and Acrylic Phantoms".
    Spokas JJ
    Med Phys; 1989; 16(4):663-4. PubMed ID: 2770639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of film and ion chamber systems for depth-dose measurements for a 25 MV beam.
    Anderson DW; St George F
    Phys Med Biol; 1979 May; 24(3):636-8. PubMed ID: 461523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Polarity effect of the thimble-type ionization chamber at a low dose rate.
    Kim YK; Park SH; Kim HS; Kang SM; Ha JH; Chung CE; Cho SY; Kim JK
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):4995-5003. PubMed ID: 16237236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.