These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5448035)

  • 1. [Various features of the sensory after-discharge of the human brain to a photic stimulus].
    Kudinova MP; Myslobodskiĭ MS
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1970; 20(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 5448035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulus intensity affects the latency but not the amplitude of the N2pc.
    Brisson B; Robitaille N; Jolicoeur P
    Neuroreport; 2007 Oct; 18(15):1627-30. PubMed ID: 17885614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accelerated and amplified neural responses in visual discrimination: Two features are processed faster than one.
    Lobaugh NJ; Chevalier H; Batty M; Taylor MJ
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(4):986-95. PubMed ID: 15961041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulation of the human brain. Spontaneous and evoked electroencephalographic responses.
    Heath RG; Guerrero-Figueroa R
    Acta Neurol Latinoam; 1968; 14(1):116-24. PubMed ID: 4318888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Position but not color deviants result in visual mismatch negativity in an active oddball task.
    Berti S
    Neuroreport; 2009 May; 20(7):702-7. PubMed ID: 19349916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Measurement and maintenance of visual attention].
    Pottier M; Laville A; Lille F; Scherrer J
    Ophthalmologica; 1969; 158 Suppl():384-9. PubMed ID: 5359739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cognitive- and movement-related potentials recorded in the human basal ganglia.
    Rektor I; Bares M; Brázdil M; Kanovský P; Rektorová I; Sochurková D; Kubová D; Kuba R; Daniel P
    Mov Disord; 2005 May; 20(5):562-8. PubMed ID: 15666424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of attended color on the P1/N1 component of visual event-related potentials.
    Omoto S; Kuroiwa Y; Wang C; Li M; Mizuki N; Hakii Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Dec; 429(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 17980488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Influence of the emotional factor on EEG correlates of a significant light stimulus recognition].
    Potulova LA
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2003; 29(4):38-44. PubMed ID: 13677195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophysiological evidence of feature-based inhibition of focused attention across consecutive trials.
    Shin E; Wan XI; Fabiani M; Gratton G; Lleras A
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Sep; 45(5):804-11. PubMed ID: 18665869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electroencephalographic evidence of sensory gating in the occipital visual cortex.
    Gjini K; Sundaresan K; Boutros NN
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(15):1519-22. PubMed ID: 18797309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Neural basis of auditory-induced shifts in visual time-order perception.
    McDonald JJ; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; Di Russo F; Hillyard SA
    Nat Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 8(9):1197-202. PubMed ID: 16056224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of feature and spatial attention on visual change detection.
    Kimura M; Katayama J; Murohashi H
    Neuroreport; 2008 Feb; 19(3):389-92. PubMed ID: 18303587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [An electrophysiological study on photosensitive epilepsy: relationship between the visual evoked response and the seizure discharge induced by intermittent photic stimulation].
    Yamamoto J
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 1968 Aug; 70(8):669-88. PubMed ID: 5749981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attention and sensory gain control: a peripheral visual process?
    Handy TC; Khoe W
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1936-49. PubMed ID: 16356330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual noise effects on emotion perception: brain potentials and stimulus identification.
    Schupp HT; Stockburger J; Schmälzle R; Bublatzky F; Weike AI; Hamm AO
    Neuroreport; 2008 Jan; 19(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 18185102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multidimensional rule, unidimensional rule, and similarity strategies in categorization: event-related brain potential correlates.
    Folstein JR; Van Petten C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Sep; 30(5):1026-44. PubMed ID: 15355134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-retinotopic feature integration decreases response-locked brain activity as revealed by electrical neuroimaging.
    Plomp G; Mercier MR; Otto TU; Blanke O; Herzog MH
    Neuroimage; 2009 Nov; 48(2):405-14. PubMed ID: 19540924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.