These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5450899)

  • 21. Effects of ambient lighting on visual discrimination, forward masking and attentional facilitation.
    Kihara AH; Tsurumaki AM; Ribeiro-do-Valle LE
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Jan; 393(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 16229950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.
    Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 19803636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of visual threat on spatial attention to touch.
    Poliakoff E; Miles E; Li X; Blanchette I
    Cognition; 2007 Mar; 102(3):405-14. PubMed ID: 16500638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Study of simple reaction time to lateralized visual stimuli].
    Borutti G; Cosi V; Magrotti E; Cerutti G
    Riv Neurol; 1980; 50(3):193-211. PubMed ID: 7466216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Temporal recalibration to tactile-visual asynchronous stimuli.
    Keetels M; Vroomen J
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jan; 430(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 18055112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accelerated and amplified neural responses in visual discrimination: Two features are processed faster than one.
    Lobaugh NJ; Chevalier H; Batty M; Taylor MJ
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jul; 26(4):986-95. PubMed ID: 15961041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. On the locus of speed-accuracy trade-off in reaction time: inferences from the lateralized readiness potential.
    Rinkenauer G; Osman A; Ulrich R; Muller-Gethmann H; Mattes S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Jun; 133(2):261-82. PubMed ID: 15149253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindness.
    Cartwright-Finch U; Lavie N
    Cognition; 2007 Mar; 102(3):321-40. PubMed ID: 16480973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. What is common to brain activity evoked by the perception of visual and auditory filled durations? A study with MEG and EEG co-recordings.
    N'Diaye K; Ragot R; Garnero L; Pouthas V
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 21(2):250-68. PubMed ID: 15464356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The omitted stimulus potential is related to the cognitive component of reaction time.
    Hernández OH; Vogel-Sprott M
    Int J Neurosci; 2008 Jan; 118(1):173-83. PubMed ID: 18041614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Different effects of exogenous cues in a visual detection and discrimination task: delayed attention withdrawal and/or speeded motor inhibition?
    Van der Lubbe RH; Vogel RO; Postma A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1829-40. PubMed ID: 16356322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Spatial attention speeds discrimination without awareness in blindsight.
    Kentridge RW; Heywood CA; Weiskrantz L
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(6):831-5. PubMed ID: 15037061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect.
    Ansorge U; Wiihr P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Apr; 30(2):365-77. PubMed ID: 15053695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict?
    Wühr P; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):872-83. PubMed ID: 18665732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Parallel allocation of attention prior to the execution of saccade sequences.
    Godijn R; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):882-96. PubMed ID: 14585012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interactions between attention and perceptual grouping in human visual cortex.
    Khoe W; Freeman E; Woldorff MG; Mangun GR
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):101-11. PubMed ID: 16500628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Acute effects of 50 Hz, 100 microT magnetic field exposure on visual duration discrimination at two different times of the day.
    Kazantzis N; Podd J; Whittington C
    Bioelectromagnetics; 1998; 19(5):310-7. PubMed ID: 9669545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sequential effects in an eight choice serial reaction time task.
    Kirby NH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1975 Jun; 39(3):205-16. PubMed ID: 1163276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A quantal interpretation of sensory channel uncertainty and reaction time and the psychological time quantum and the discrimination of succession. NASA Contract Rep NASA CR-455.
    Kristofferson AB
    NASA Contract Rep NASA CR; 1966 May; ():1-35. PubMed ID: 5295952
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Influence of diurnal changes and training on reaction time in choice reactions].
    Aschoff JC; Giedke J; Pöppel E
    Pflugers Arch; 1969; 312(1):R65-6. PubMed ID: 5390282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.