These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 545122)

  • 41. The x-ray light valve: a low-cost, digital radiographic imaging system--spatial resolution.
    MacDougall RD; Koprinarov I; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2008 Sep; 35(9):4216-27. PubMed ID: 18841872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Use of a line-pair resolution phantom for comprehensive quality assurance of electronic portal imaging devices based on fundamental imaging metrics.
    Gopal A; Samant SS
    Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):2006-15. PubMed ID: 19610289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [The effect of technical parameters on diagnostic quality].
    Brandt GA
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Jan; 1(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 2018801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Technical Note: Impact on detective quantum efficiency of edge angle determination method by International Electrotechnical Commission methodology for cardiac x-ray image detectors.
    Gislason-Lee AJ; Tunstall CM; Kengyelics SK; Cowen AR; Davies AG
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4423-7. PubMed ID: 26233172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
    Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Physical characteristics of modern radiographic screen-film systems.
    Rao GU; Fatouros PP; James AE
    Invest Radiol; 1978; 13(5):460-9. PubMed ID: 753799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Reducing the weight of the EC-L cassette.
    Munro P; Mulligan M
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Sep; 54(1):290-9. PubMed ID: 12183003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of the imaging properties of two generations of a CCD-based system for digital chest radiography.
    Båth M; Sund P; Månsson LG
    Med Phys; 2002 Oct; 29(10):2286-97. PubMed ID: 12408303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Technique charts for Kodak EC-L film screen system for portal localization in a 6MV X-ray beam.
    Sandilos P; Antypas C; Paraskevopoulou C; Kouvaris J; Vlachos L
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(6):467-72. PubMed ID: 17148858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Technical note. Evaluation of a new screen/film combination.
    Evans AL; Davison M; McLellan J; James WB
    Br J Radiol; 1975 Oct; 48(574):858-9. PubMed ID: 1191907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Absolute speeds of screen-film systems and their absorbed-energy constants.
    Kodera Y; Doi K; Chan HP
    Radiology; 1984 Apr; 151(1):229-36. PubMed ID: 6701320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Sensitivity study of proton radiography and comparison with kV and MV x-ray imaging using GEANT4 Monte Carlo simulations.
    Depauw N; Seco J
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Apr; 56(8):2407-21. PubMed ID: 21427482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A study of the effects of lead foil in dental X-ray film packets on radiographic image quality.
    Araki K; Kanda S; Toyofuku F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Nov; 22(4):179-82. PubMed ID: 8181643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD; Geibel MA
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Calibrating automatic exposure control devices for digital radiography.
    Doyle P; Martin CJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5475-85. PubMed ID: 17047264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Secondary photon scatter in imaging cassettes.
    McLean D
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1998 Sep; 21(3):101-11. PubMed ID: 9848944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of dual energy detector system performance.
    Alvarez RE; Seibert JA; Thompson SK
    Med Phys; 2004 Mar; 31(3):556-65. PubMed ID: 15070254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Photo-effect of the fluorescence from the opposite intensifying screen on the emulsion of the x-ray film].
    Tanaka Y
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1971 Feb; 30(11):131-5. PubMed ID: 5291799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Screen/film system speed: its dependence on x-ray energy.
    Vyborny CJ; Metz CE; Doi K; Rossmann K
    Radiology; 1977 Dec; 125(3):811-6. PubMed ID: 928715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.