These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5459730)

  • 1. Guidelines for the design of laboratory surveys.
    Skendzel LP
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1970 Sep; 54(3):437-47. PubMed ID: 5459730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A revised scheme for the comparison of quantitative methods.
    Barnett RN; Youden WJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1970 Sep; 54(3):454-62. PubMed ID: 5459733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The 1949 College of American Pathologists survey revisited.
    Skendzel LP; Hanson DJ; Civin WH
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1970 Sep; 54(3):493-5. PubMed ID: 5459735
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of methods for conducting laboratory proficiency surveys.
    Martinek RG; Becktel JM; Forster GF; Morrissey RA
    Health Lab Sci; 1968 Oct; 5(4):239-56. PubMed ID: 5696258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. "BKK system"--an initiative for efficient quality assessment in diagnostic laboratories of countries of the former Soviet Union.
    Lapin A; Endler AT; Moshkin A
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1995 Nov; 33(11):877-80. PubMed ID: 8620068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Quality control in the clinical biology laboratory].
    Mascart P
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1971; 29(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 5579077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Reliability of clinical chemical and hematologic laboratory analysis].
    Bürgi W
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1972 Mar; 102(11):367-74. PubMed ID: 5033618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Quality control in the laboratory].
    Wisser H; Knoll E
    Med Klin; 1974 Aug; 69(31):1287-96. PubMed ID: 4610333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laboratory precision performance: state of the art versus operating specifications that assure the analytical quality required by clinical laboratory improvement amendments proficiency testing.
    Westgard JO; Bawa N; Ross JW; Lawson NS
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Jul; 120(7):621-5. PubMed ID: 8757464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Answering your question on blood film reviews.
    Koepke JA
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1997 Jun; 29(6):12. PubMed ID: 10173034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A system to monitor a portion of the total testing process in medical clinics and laboratories: feasibility of a split-specimen design.
    Shahangian S; Krolak JM; Gaunt EE; Cohn RD
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):503-11. PubMed ID: 9625417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Standardization of diagnostic laboratory methods--results, experiences and future goals.
    Dummler W
    Przegl Lek; 1989; 46(7):574-7. PubMed ID: 2587783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Pathology Laboratory Act 2007 explained.
    Looi LM
    Malays J Pathol; 2008 Jun; 30(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 19108405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic versus random error in laboratory surveys.
    Skendzel LP; Youden WJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1970 Sep; 54(3):448-50. PubMed ID: 5459731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speak out for quality pathology and laboratory medicine.
    Keren DF
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2004 Aug; 122(2):314. PubMed ID: 15323149
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Country reports from Japan: external quality assessment scheme in Japan.
    Tatsumi N; Kawai T; Funahara Y; Sumiyoshi A; Kawano K; Watanabe K; Matsuno K; Takubo T; Tsuda I
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1999; 30 Suppl 3():15-25. PubMed ID: 10926254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The advent of chemical screening techniques.
    Young DM; Drake N; Weir RJ
    Can Med Assoc J; 1968 May; 98(18):868-70. PubMed ID: 5648039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The quality of laboratory testing today: an assessment of sigma metrics for analytic quality using performance data from proficiency testing surveys and the CLIA criteria for acceptable performance.
    Westgard JO; Westgard SA
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Mar; 125(3):343-54. PubMed ID: 16613337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality performance in clinical pathology.
    Cooper GR
    Prog Clin Pathol; 1970; 3():1-71. PubMed ID: 4950004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Proficiency testing in the physician's office laboratory: an ounce of prevention.
    Hain RF
    J Tenn Med Assoc; 1973 Dec; 66(12):1138-40. PubMed ID: 4776031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.