These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5463321)

  • 1. Comparison of two sample proportions by the normal difference test. Distribution of chance differences between two sample proportions. Standard error of the difference between two sample proportions. Location of a sample difference on the distribution of chance differences.
    Bahn AK
    Woman Physician; 1970 Feb; 25(2):97-113. PubMed ID: 5463321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The normal curve as an approximation to the binomial distribution (for large samples) properties of the normal curve standardized normal curve application to a large binomial sample standard error of the proportion.
    Bahn AK
    Woman Physician; 1970 Jan; 25(1):20-32. PubMed ID: 5420859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical methodology for clinical trials of caries prophylactic agents--current knowledge.
    Worthington H
    Int Dent J; 1984 Dec; 34(4):278-84. PubMed ID: 6597135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multichannel 18-test panels: are 60% of panels abnormal by chance?
    Desbiens NA; Turney SL; Gani KS
    J Lab Clin Med; 1990 Mar; 115(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 2313161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proportions with extraneous variance: two dependent samples.
    Kleinman JC
    Biometrics; 1975 Sep; 31(3):737-43. PubMed ID: 1174627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A graphical aid for determining sample size when comparing two independent proportions.
    Feigl P
    Biometrics; 1978 Mar; 34(1):111-22. PubMed ID: 630034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical distribution of the difference of two proportions.
    Nadarajah S; Kotz S
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3518-21. PubMed ID: 16955537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistics for clinicians. 2. Nominal data (I).
    Nanivadekar AS; Kannappan AR
    J Assoc Physicians India; 1990 Dec; 38(12):931-5, 974. PubMed ID: 2096131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A compact nomogram for a comparison of the difference between 2 percentages of risks].
    Rümke CL
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1983 May; 127(21):915-8. PubMed ID: 6346114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comment on sampling error in the standardized mean difference with unequal sample sizes: avoiding potential errors in meta-analytic and primary research.
    Laczo RM; Sackett PR; Bobko P; Cortina JM
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Jul; 90(4):758-64. PubMed ID: 16060792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On approximate sample sizes for comparing two independent proportions with the use of Yates' correction.
    Ury HK; Fleiss JL
    Biometrics; 1980 Jun; 36(2):347-51. PubMed ID: 7407322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size for testing and estimating the difference between two paired and unpaired proportions: a 'two-step' procedure combining power and the probability of obtaining a precise estimate.
    Cesana BM
    Stat Med; 2004 Aug; 23(15):2359-73. PubMed ID: 15273953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian analysis for proportions with an independent background effect.
    Bi J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):71-83. PubMed ID: 17535580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monte Carlo investigation of a model for competing risks.
    Atta GJ; Kimball AW
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1968 Mar; 40(3):525-34. PubMed ID: 5644203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Information-theoretical error analysis of a form-comparison test].
    Faulwasser H; Kittlaus H; Rädel HJ
    Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1975 Jan; 27(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 1223926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acceptance sampling based on truncated life tests in the Birnbaum Saunders model.
    Baklizi A; El Qader El Masri A
    Risk Anal; 2004 Dec; 24(6):1453-7. PubMed ID: 15660603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative analysis of population age-sex distribution from sample and complete enumeration: 1970 and 1980 census data.
    Abejo S
    J Philipp Stat; 1991; 42(1):ix-. PubMed ID: 12287046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian sample size calculations for a non-inferiority test of two proportions in clinical trials.
    Daimon T
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jul; 29(4):507-16. PubMed ID: 18201944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On a truncation-flexible repeated significance test.
    Edelman D
    Biometrics; 1994 Dec; 50(4):1153-7. PubMed ID: 7786996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [A comparison of complete and truncated birth histories to measure fertility and child mortality].
    Goldman N; Westoff CF; Moreno L
    Notas Poblacion; 1988; 16(46-47):105-19. PubMed ID: 12282539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.