These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5463937)

  • 1. [Remote masking in cochlear microphonics].
    Tanabe H
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1970 Apr; 73(4):462-72. PubMed ID: 5463937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Remote masking by cochlear microphonics].
    Tanabe H; Tanemura Y; Isoshima G
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1969 Feb; 72(2):346-7. PubMed ID: 5388763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Longitudinal distribution of the cochlear microphonics inside the cochlear duct (guinea pig).
    Honrubia V; Ward PH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1968 Oct; 44(4):951-8. PubMed ID: 5683661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Observations on cochlear potentials following intensive sound stimuli].
    Aran JM
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1966; 87(9):780-4. PubMed ID: 5976753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequency and intensity relationships in the cochlear microphonics of guinea pigs.
    Suga F; Snow JB
    Pract Otorhinolaryngol (Basel); 1971; 33(3):176-84. PubMed ID: 5129071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of electrical stimulation of the olivo cochlear bundle at the cochlear level.
    Buño W; García-Ausit E
    Acta Neurol Latinoam; 1970; 16(1):125-38. PubMed ID: 5538050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Relationship between the pseudothreshold and maximum output of cochlear microphonics].
    Shida S; Kanno S; Imai J; Morita S; Fujii M
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1971 Feb; 74(2):332-3. PubMed ID: 5106606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined effect of sound and oxygen deprivation upon cochlear microphonics in guinea pigs.
    TONNDORF J; HYDE RW; BROGAN FA
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1955 Jun; 64(2):392-405. PubMed ID: 14388560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanism of the short-term poststimulatory depression of the cochlear microphonics (hysteresis).
    Legouix JP; Pierson A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1973 Jul; 54(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 4354420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurement of the cochlear potentials of the guinea pig at constant sound-pressure level at the eardrum. I. Cochlear-microphonic amplitude and phase.
    Laszlo CA; Gannon RP; Milsum JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1970 Apr; 47(4):1063-70. PubMed ID: 5443153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Effect of intravenous injection of aspirin on the cochlea].
    Kumagai M
    Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi; 1992 Mar; 67(2):216-33. PubMed ID: 1597302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cochlear potentials in the study of cochlear physiology.
    Siegel JH
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1986; 25():35-47. PubMed ID: 3554482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Frequency analysis, animal experimental study of cochlear microphonics after injection of histamine in guinea pigs].
    Nowak R; Dahl D
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1972 May; 73(5):391-3. PubMed ID: 5031967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Postactivation potentiation of guinea pig cochlear microphonic potentials.
    Veselý C; Faltýnek L
    Sb Ved Pr Lek Fak Karlovy Univerzity Hradci Kralove; 1971; 14(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 5289894
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cochlear potentials inside the cochlear duct at the level of the round window.
    Honrubia V; Ward PH
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1969 Dec; 78(6):1189-200. PubMed ID: 4983954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Suppressing effect of substance P receptor antagonist on sound evoked potentials recorded from the guinea pig cochlea.
    Liang X; Wang Z; Zhang L; Ni D
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1999 Feb; 112(2):129-31. PubMed ID: 11593577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of selective cochlear toxicity and vestibular deafferentation on vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in guinea pigs.
    Shojaku H; Zang RL; Tsubota M; Fujisaka M; Hori E; Nishijo H; Watanabe Y
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Apr; 127(4):430-5. PubMed ID: 17453466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory thresholds and cochlear microphonics from the same guinea pigs.
    Walloch RA; Taylor-Spikes M
    J Aud Res; 1977 Jul; 17(3):145-54. PubMed ID: 617343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Examination of the sensitivity of cochlear microphonics (CM) as the index of the activity of the hair cell].
    Shida T; Sugano T; Maruyama R; Takegami T; Imai J
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1972 Oct; 75(10):1022-3. PubMed ID: 4676068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effects of strong whole body vibration on cochlear microphonics of the internal ear].
    Yamaura K
    Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi; 1975 Jan; 50(1):70-2. PubMed ID: 1171059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.