These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5467389)

  • 1. The "normal" range.
    Elveback L
    JAMA; 1970 May; 212(5):883. PubMed ID: 5467389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The "normal" range.
    Gambino SR
    JAMA; 1970 May; 212(5):883. PubMed ID: 5467388
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of variance, control charts, and the clinical laboratory. A system of quality control.
    Amenta JS
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1968 Jun; 49(6):842-9. PubMed ID: 5654513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Time to harmonise common laboratory test profiles.
    Smellie WS;
    BMJ; 2012 Mar; 344():e1169. PubMed ID: 22434088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification of preanalytical mistakes in the stat section of the clinical laboratory.
    Romero A; Muñoz M; Ramos JR; Campos A; Ramírez G
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2005; 43(9):974-5. PubMed ID: 16176181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Change in the Reference Values for Serum Vitamin B12: Impact on the Clinical Laboratory.
    Ajuria-Morentin I; Mar-Medina C; Aguirre-Larracoechea U; Quintana-Lopez JM; Ruiz-Larrea B; Cortes-Fernandez C
    Clin Lab; 2016 Dec; 62(12):2469-2471. PubMed ID: 28164556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality control for hematology.
    Dorsey DB
    Postgrad Med; 1968 May; 43(5):39-41. PubMed ID: 5648659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Weekly clinicopathological exercises. Normal reference laboratory values.
    N Engl J Med; 1978 Jan; 298(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 618449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Are laboratory results reliable? Serious factors are involved].
    Theodorsson E
    Lakartidningen; 1997 May; 94(22):2092-6. PubMed ID: 9213666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Standardization of diagnostic assays for animal acute phase proteins.
    Eckersall PD; Duthie S; Toussaint MJ; Gruys E; Heegaard P; Alava M; Lipperheide C; Madec F
    Adv Vet Med; 1999; 41():643-55. PubMed ID: 9890051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analytical interferences from calcium dobesilate in five serum assays.
    Muros M; López T; León C; Merino M; Calvo M
    Clin Chem; 1993 Feb; 39(2):371. PubMed ID: 8432036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Updated reference intervals for clinical chemical components].
    Urdal P; Bolann B; Marstein S; Rustad P; Steensland H; Asberg A
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2004 Jun; 124(11):1515-7. PubMed ID: 15195155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [CME--Laboratory 15/ Solution].
    Eckardstein A
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 2010 Mar; 99(5):325-7. PubMed ID: 20205094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The correct use of clinical biology. General considerations].
    Delwaide PA
    Rev Med Liege; 1981 Mar; 36(6):223-30. PubMed ID: 7291805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medical appropriateness of laboratory tests.
    Wong ET; Saxena S
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1992 Jun; 97(6):748-50. PubMed ID: 1595594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How high is high? A proposed alternative to the normal range.
    Elveback LR
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1972 Feb; 47(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 5010728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality assessment of smear microscopy by stratified lot sampling of treatment follow-up slides.
    Otero L; Van Deun A; Agapito J; Ugaz R; Prellwitz G; Gotuzzo E; Van der Stuyft P
    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2011 Feb; 15(2):211-6, i. PubMed ID: 21219683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of two osmometers at the clinical chemistry laboratory].
    Belhouachi N; Jaisson S; Garnotel R; Gillery P
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2007; 65(5):545-9. PubMed ID: 17913674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of laboratory error on the normal range: a Bayesian model.
    Krause RD; Anand VD; Gruemer HD; Willke TA
    Clin Chem; 1975 Mar; 21(3):321-4. PubMed ID: 1112041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk factors for false positive and for false negative test results in screening with fecal occult blood testing.
    Stegeman I; de Wijkerslooth TR; Stoop EM; van Leerdam M; van Ballegooijen M; Kraaijenhagen RA; Fockens P; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Bossuyt PM
    Int J Cancer; 2013 Nov; 133(10):2408-14. PubMed ID: 23649826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.