These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5470501)

  • 1. Critical-band theory and the auditory-evoked slow-wave V potential.
    Skinner PH; Antinoro F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1970 Aug; 48(2):557-60. PubMed ID: 5470501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory evoked responses. The basis for a promising objective audiometric test.
    Henriksen O; Kotby MN; Kayan A
    J Laryngol Otol; 1971 Mar; 85(3):233-42. PubMed ID: 5550605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evoked response audiometry in newborn infants.
    Taguchi K; Picton TW; Orpin JA; Goodman WS
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1969; 252():5-17. PubMed ID: 5267212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural correlates of the precedence effect in auditory evoked potentials.
    Damaschke J; Riedel H; Kollmeier B
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):157-71. PubMed ID: 15953525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of high frequencies and intersubject variability on the auditory-evoked cortical response.
    Rothman HH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1970 Feb; 47(2):569-73. PubMed ID: 5439656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Acoustically evoked potentials (AEP) in man due to either periodic signals or due to broad-band signals (author's transl)].
    Pantew C; Khachidze O; Galle E; Gobsch H; Sasama R
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1974; 208(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 4480402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A method of objective audiometry: electroencephalographic audiometry].
    Gerin P; Morgon A; Charachon D; Munier F; Pernier J; Arnal D; Lebreton MF
    J Fr Otorhinolaryngol Audiophonol Chir Maxillofac (1967); 1968 Sep; 17(7):542-95. PubMed ID: 4247604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Averaged evoked response audiometry (ERA) in young children during sleep.
    Suzuki T; Origuchi K
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1969; 252():19-28. PubMed ID: 5267209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence for differential modulation of primary and nonprimary auditory cortex by forward masking in tinnitus.
    Roberts LE; Bosnyak DJ; Bruce IC; Gander PE; Paul BT
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():9-27. PubMed ID: 25937134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of auditory deprivation on the development of auditory sensitivity in albino rats.
    Batkin S; Groth H; Watson JR; Ansberry M
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1970 Apr; 28(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 4192073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Present day scope and limitations of evoked response audiometry.
    Beagley HA
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1971 Nov; 92():Suppl:753-63. PubMed ID: 5148989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Audiometry of auditory evoked potentials].
    Poch Broto J
    An Otorrinolaringol Ibero Am; 1976; 3(4):387-403. PubMed ID: 797272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A study of evoked potentials from ear-EEG.
    Kidmose P; Looney D; Ungstrup M; Rank ML; Mandic DP
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Oct; 60(10):2824-30. PubMed ID: 23722447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evoked response audiometry (ERA)--an objective method to examine hearing].
    Burian K
    HNO; 1969 Dec; 17(12):353-8. PubMed ID: 4905794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation of 5 years of electroencephalographic audiometry].
    Morgon A; Charachon D; Gerin P
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1971 Nov; 92():Suppl:765-72. PubMed ID: 5148990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical application of evoked-response audiometry.
    van der Sandt W
    S Afr Med J; 1969 Jan; 43(2):33-5. PubMed ID: 5776804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of signal duration and rise time on the auditory evoked potential.
    Skinner PH; Jones HC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1968 Jun; 11(2):301-6. PubMed ID: 5664258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discrepancies between subjective and objective acoustic thresholds.
    Burian K; Gestring GF
    Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1971; 198(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 5573664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Averaged evoked myogenic responses in normal man.
    Cody DT; Bickford RG
    Laryngoscope; 1969 Mar; 79(3):400-16. PubMed ID: 5776736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behavioral and human evoked response thresholds as a function of frequency.
    Henderson D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1972 Jun; 15(2):390-4. PubMed ID: 5047877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.