These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5476025)
1. Medical record systems with special reference to numerical filing. O'Donovan JB; Smith JW J R Coll Gen Pract; 1970 Jul; 20(96):54-6. PubMed ID: 5476025 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Group practice: records and confidential record handling. Mackenzie HM J R Coll Gen Pract; 1970 Dec; 20 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):27-31. PubMed ID: 5493628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Converting medical records to A4 size in general practice. Acheson HW J R Coll Gen Pract; 1976 Apr; 26(165):277-81. PubMed ID: 1271325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Standardized filing system in the family doctor's surgery. Marsh GN; Simons ME Br Med J; 1967 Jan; 1(5533):163-5. PubMed ID: 6015652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The clinical record in British general practice. Tait IG Br Med J; 1977 Sep; 2(6088):683-8. PubMed ID: 302728 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A practical approach to medical records in a rural health care setting. Tatro P J Rural Health; 1987 Jan; 3(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 10295366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A patient and family number assignment and chart filing system for family physicians. Renner JH; Piernot RW; Bauman EA; Treleven DE Med Care; 1975 Apr; 13(4):346-59. PubMed ID: 1121197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An integrated system for the recording and retrieval of medical data in a primary care setting. Part 5: implications of filing charts by area of residence. Farley ES J Fam Pract; 1974; 1(3-4):43-7. PubMed ID: 4452875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. New record folder for use in general practice. Hawkey JK; Loudon IS; Greenhalgh GP; Bungay GT Br Med J; 1971 Dec; 4(5788):667-70. PubMed ID: 5134567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is it worthwhile to file by family folders in family practice? An opposing view. Schneeweiss R J Fam Pract; 1990 Jun; 30(6):700-3. PubMed ID: 2345339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. No one-size-fits-all solution. Gilmour B Health Estate; 2003 Feb; 57(2):45-7. PubMed ID: 12624902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical records. V: A 4 record system and all that. Elliott A Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1981 Apr; 282(6273):1363-5. PubMed ID: 6786500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The College record system. Stevens J Aust Fam Physician; 1979 Oct; 8(10):1106-7. PubMed ID: 316323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Is it worthwhile to file by family folders in family practice? An affirmative view. Farley ES J Fam Pract; 1990 Jun; 30(6):697-700. PubMed ID: 2345338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. RECORDING OF MORBIDITY OF FAMILIES: F. BOOK. KUENSSBERG EV J Coll Gen Pract; 1964 May; 7(3):410-22. PubMed ID: 14142941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The base record: essential tool for comprehensive care. Aitken AM N Z Med J; 1974 Mar; 79(511):776-81. PubMed ID: 4524811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Problems of medical record storage with an optical disk filing system--with special reference to image quality. Yamauchi K; Miura T Jpn Hosp; 1988 Jul; 7():29-33. PubMed ID: 10290896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Record linkage in general practice: the computer and medical records. Grant D Practitioner; 1970 Mar; 204(221):444-5. PubMed ID: 5434409 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Redesign of medical records in general practice. Br Med J; 1973 Jul; 3(5873):234-5. PubMed ID: 4718848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]