These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5476109)

  • 1. Monitoring performance on visual and auditory displays.
    Jones TN; Kirk RE
    Percept Mot Skills; 1970 Feb; 30(1):235-8. PubMed ID: 5476109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of in-vehicle warning information displays with or without spatial compatibility on driving behaviors and response performance.
    Liu YC; Jhuang JW
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jul; 43(4):679-86. PubMed ID: 22103964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Advanced auditory displays and head-mounted displays: advantages and disadvantages for monitoring by the distracted anesthesiologist.
    Sanderson PM; Watson MO; Russell WJ; Jenkins S; Liu D; Green N; Llewelyn K; Cole P; Shek V; Krupenia SS
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Jun; 106(6):1787-97. PubMed ID: 18499611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of visual and auditory knowledge of results and reward on vigilance performance.
    Grunzke ME; Kirk RE; Fischer SC
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Jun; 38(3):831-6. PubMed ID: 4842439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of visual, auditory, and cutaneous tracking displays when divided attention is required to a cross-adaptive loading task.
    Schori TR
    Ergonomics; 1973 Mar; 16(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 4726649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention.
    Schmitt M; Postma A; De Haan E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):105-30. PubMed ID: 10718066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Choice reaction time: the location of auditory and visual similarity.
    Clement DE; Hawkins HL; Hosking KE
    Am J Psychol; 1973 Mar; 86(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 4742383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monitoring performance with a time-shared encoding task.
    Tyler DM; Halcomb CG
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Apr; 38(2):383-6. PubMed ID: 4824062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic crossmodal links revealed by steady-state responses in auditory-visual divided attention.
    de Jong R; Toffanin P; Harbers M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Jan; 75(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 19819271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stimulus intensity and foreperiod effects in intersensory facilitation.
    Bernstein IH; Chu PK; Briggs P; Schurman DL
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1973 May; 25(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 4515814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory, tactile, and multisensory cues facilitate search for dynamic visual stimuli.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1654-65. PubMed ID: 20675808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory pretraining as a determinant of visual thresholds for pseudowords.
    Richards LG; Hempstead JD
    Am J Psychol; 1973 Jun; 86(2):325-9. PubMed ID: 4775380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Studies of auditory-visual differences in human time judgment. 2. More transmitted information with sounds than lights.
    Lhamon WT; Goldstone S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Aug; 39(1):295-307. PubMed ID: 4415925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Momentary fluctuations in allocation of attention: cross-modal effects of visual task load on auditory discrimination.
    Haroush K; Hochstein S; Deouell LY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jul; 22(7):1440-51. PubMed ID: 19580389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Division of attention: evidence for a between-trial component of impaired performance.
    Long J
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1977 Feb; 29(1):107-16. PubMed ID: 860004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Crossmodal facilitation of masked visual target discrimination by informative auditory cuing.
    Ngo MK; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 20580658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does intermodal equivalence exist between heteromodal stimulus dimensions or between stimulus values on those dimensions?
    Harvey N
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1973 Nov; 25(4):476-91. PubMed ID: 4767531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.