These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5478856)

  • 1. The effect of acoustic confusability on visual search.
    Krueger LE
    Am J Psychol; 1970 Sep; 83(3):389-400. PubMed ID: 5478856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Familiarity effects in visual information processing.
    Krueger LE
    Psychol Bull; 1975 Nov; 82(6):949-74. PubMed ID: 1103203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type.
    Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 19803636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual attention, auditory stimulation, and language discrimination in young infants. IX. Disscusion and conclusions.
    Horowitz FD
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 1974 Dec; 39(5-6):105-15. PubMed ID: 4464450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Memory in a bisensory selective attention task.
    Hall R; Swane D
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1973 Aug; 25(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 4807291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Choice reaction time: the location of auditory and visual similarity.
    Clement DE; Hawkins HL; Hosking KE
    Am J Psychol; 1973 Mar; 86(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 4742383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Habituation rate and the infant's response to visual discrepancies.
    McCall RB; Hogarty PS; Hamilton JS; Vincent JH
    Child Dev; 1973 Jun; 44(2):280-7. PubMed ID: 4705555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modality and sex differences in recall and recognition memory.
    May RB; Hutt C
    Child Dev; 1974 Mar; 45(1):228-31. PubMed ID: 4820280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.
    Houtkamp R; Roelfsema PR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):423-42. PubMed ID: 16634680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Double dissociations in visual and spatial short-term memory.
    Klauer KC; Zhao Z
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2004 Sep; 133(3):355-81. PubMed ID: 15355144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recognition memory in reflective and impulsive preschool children.
    Siegel AW; Kirasic KC; Kilburg RR
    Child Dev; 1973 Sep; 44(3):651-6. PubMed ID: 4730540
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Verbal and visuospatial short-term and working memory in children: are they separable?
    Alloway TP; Gathercole SE; Pickering SJ
    Child Dev; 2006; 77(6):1698-716. PubMed ID: 17107455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Influence of attention on an auditory-verbal learning test in schizophrenic patients].
    Huguelet P; Nicastro R; Zanello A
    Encephale; 2002; 28(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 12232538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual search patterns in neglect: comparison of peripersonal and extrapersonal space.
    Butler BC; Lawrence M; Eskes GA; Klein R
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):869-78. PubMed ID: 19154749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recall of messages presented simultaneously to auditory and visual channels with varying uncertainty and delay of message.
    Newsome LR; Long NR
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Feb; 38(1):24. PubMed ID: 4815502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revisiting evidence for modularity and functional equivalence across verbal and spatial domains in memory.
    Guérard K; Tremblay S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):556-69. PubMed ID: 18444756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selective decline in information processing in subgroups of multiple sclerosis: an 8-year longitudinal study.
    Bergendal G; Fredrikson S; Almkvist O
    Eur Neurol; 2007; 57(4):193-202. PubMed ID: 17272938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds: support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction.
    Hughes RW; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1050-61. PubMed ID: 17983312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.