These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5481262)

  • 1. Monte Carlo studies of selection and inbreeding in swine. 3. Gene frequency.
    Bereskin B; Shelby CE; Hazel LN; Norton HW
    J Anim Sci; 1970 Nov; 31(5):828-36. PubMed ID: 5481262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monte Carlo studies of selection and inbreeding in swine. I. Genetic and phenotypic trends.
    Bereskin B; Shelby CE; Hazel LN
    J Anim Sci; 1969 Nov; 29(5):678-86. PubMed ID: 5391965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selection and mutation within and among full-sib lines.
    Clegg MT; Kidwell JF
    J Hered; 1974; 65(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 4847752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of selection and linkage on inbreeding.
    Bogyo TP; Ting SW
    Aust J Biol Sci; 1968 Feb; 21(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 5647220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Polymorphism in an inbreeding population under models involving underdominance.
    Jain SK; Jain KB
    Science; 1969 Dec; 166(3910):1294-6. PubMed ID: 5350327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The joint effects of selection and dominance on the QST - FST contrast.
    Santure AW; Wang J
    Genetics; 2009 Jan; 181(1):259-76. PubMed ID: 18984567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic drift and the response to selection in simulated populations: the simulation model and gene and genotype responses.
    Sather AP; Swiger LA; Harvey WR
    J Anim Sci; 1977 Mar; 44(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 845084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Inferring purging from pedigree data.
    Gulisija D; Crow JF
    Evolution; 2007 May; 61(5):1043-51. PubMed ID: 17492959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The robustness of Hamilton's rule with inbreeding and dominance: kin selection and fixation probabilities under partial sib mating.
    Roze D; Rousset F
    Am Nat; 2004 Aug; 164(2):214-31. PubMed ID: 15278845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Towards a theory of the evolution of modifier genes.
    Karlin S; McGregor J
    Theor Popul Biol; 1974 Feb; 5(1):59-103. PubMed ID: 4818408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of dominance on the use of the QST - FST contrast to detect natural selection on quantitative traits.
    López-Fanjul C; Fernández A; Toro MA
    Genetics; 2007 May; 176(1):725-7. PubMed ID: 17339213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selection and concurrent inbreeding in simulated beef herds.
    Davis ME; Brinks JS
    J Anim Sci; 1983 Jan; 56(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 6826479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Consequences of elimination of the Rendement Napole allele from Danish Hampshire.
    Closter AM; Guldbrandtsen B; Henryon M; Nielsen B; Berg P
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2011 Jun; 128(3):192-200. PubMed ID: 21554413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Effect of population size of performance test on short-term selection result of sire line].
    Zhang H; Li JQ; Wang C; Liu XH; Chen YS
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 2005 Jul; 32(7):696-703. PubMed ID: 16078737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of inbreeding resulting from selection for scrapie resistance: a model for rare sheep breeds.
    Brown C; Orford M; Tzamaloukas O; Mavrogenis AP; Miltiadou D
    Vet Rec; 2014 Dec 20-27; 175(24):624. PubMed ID: 25280776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetic variance components and heritability of multiallelic heterozygosity under inbreeding.
    Nietlisbach P; Keller LF; Postma E
    Heredity (Edinb); 2016 Jan; 116(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 26174022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A heterotic model for the evolution of duplications.
    Spofford JB
    Brookhaven Symp Biol; 1972; 23():121-43. PubMed ID: 5047197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Change in frequency of a rare mutant allele: a general formula and applications to partial inbreeding models.
    Lessard S; Rocheleau G
    J Math Biol; 2003 Jan; 46(1):71-94. PubMed ID: 12525936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models.
    Vitezica ZG; Reverter A; Herring W; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):71. PubMed ID: 30577727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The contribution of dominance to the understanding of quantitative genetic variation.
    Wellmann R; Bennewitz J
    Genet Res (Camb); 2011 Apr; 93(2):139-54. PubMed ID: 21481291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.