These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [Original method of cesarean section operation and its role in the prevention of obstetric complications]. Koridze ShA; Kintraia NP; Dzhincharadze DA; Koridze ASh; Mukhadze IG Georgian Med News; 2010 Nov; (188):20-6. PubMed ID: 21178198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Possibilities of controlling blood loss during and after labor]. Szemesi I; Zubek L; Szanyi L Acta Chir Acad Sci Hung; 1974; 15(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 4549284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Can a 29% cesarean delivery rate possibly be justified? Harer WB Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):693. PubMed ID: 16946234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Traditional rapid sequence induction is an outmoded technique for caesarean section and should be modified. Proposed. Levy DM Int J Obstet Anesth; 2006 Jul; 15(3):227-9. PubMed ID: 16798449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Summary of consensus development conference--childbirth by cesarean delivery. Rosen MG J La State Med Soc; 1982; 134(3):94, 98. PubMed ID: 7119547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Breech presentation. Plea for delivery by cesarean section]. Lorenz U; Drack G Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1996; 259 Suppl 1():S156-60. PubMed ID: 9133269 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A clinical trial of active management of labor. Manassiev N N Engl J Med; 1996 Mar; 334(12):798; author reply 798-9. PubMed ID: 8592560 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A clinical trial of active management of labor. Peaceman AM; Socol ML; López-Zeno JA N Engl J Med; 1996 Mar; 334(12):797-8; author reply 798-9. PubMed ID: 8592559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Can a 29% cesarean delivery rate possibly be justified? Resnik R Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):752-4. PubMed ID: 16582108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Labor in patients with previous cesarean section]. Diaz Castellanos R Acta Obstet Ginecol Hisp Lusit; 1968; 16(2):97-111. PubMed ID: 5720776 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Evolution of indications for cesarean section between 1991 and 2000 in materials from the Pathology Clinic in the Department of Pregnancy and Labor, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin]. Bilar M Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():173-92. PubMed ID: 15552847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The most favorable time for a repeated delivery after cesarean section]. Wojdecki J; Plocharski L; Mokwiński B Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1970 Nov; 82(46):828-30. PubMed ID: 5521421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Fetus in breech presentation, what should be told to the mother?]. Kuismanen K; Uotila J; Kirkinen P Duodecim; 2004; 120(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 15065505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Uterine rupture: literature review and Genevan experience (1980-1994)]. Valiton-Crusi A Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1996 Apr; 116(4):273-6. PubMed ID: 8693255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cause and prevention of maternal aspiration. Gibbs CP; Rolbin SH; Norman P Anesthesiology; 1984 Jul; 61(1):111-2. PubMed ID: 6742475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Obstetrical management in enucleated myoma]. Rempen A Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 1998; 202(2):91. PubMed ID: 9654723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]