These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Technique of simultaneous direct intrauterine pressure recording for electronic monitoring of twin gestation in labor. Read JA; Miller FC Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Sep; 129(2):228-30. PubMed ID: 900187 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. The relationship of the maximum amplitude and the maximum and minimum slope of the intrauterine pressure waveform in late pregnancy and labor. Thorne DO; Assadi I; Flores J; Seitchik J IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1972 Sep; 19(5):388-90. PubMed ID: 5038395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. A clinical fetal monitor. Paul RH; Hon EH Obstet Gynecol; 1970 Feb; 35(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 5467078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Observations on heart rate and pH in the human fetus during labor. Kubli FW; Hon EH; Khazin AF; Takemura H Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1969 Aug; 104(8):1190-206. PubMed ID: 5807980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. [Fetal heart rate. Attempt at its quantitative evaluation during labor]. Sureau C; Chavinié J; Meziou ML; Le Houezec R J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1972; 1(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 5071924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Computer monitoring of fetal heart rate and uterine pressure. Crawford JW Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Feb; 121(3):342-50. PubMed ID: 1115148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Manometric evaluation of labor. Brown FB Obstet Gynecol; 1975 Apr; 45(4):473-5. PubMed ID: 1121378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Automatic periodic measurement of uterine activity during labor]. Elhaik S; Danin M; Barrier J Nouv Presse Med; 1979 Nov; 8(46):3837. PubMed ID: 534257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. [Physical and biochemical parameters during normal childbirth]. Puech F Lille Med; 1974 Jan; 19(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 4849396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. [Fetal heart rate monitoring and the nursing role in fetal monitoring]. Hornig LC Hu Li Za Zhi; 1976 Oct; 23(4):61-4. PubMed ID: 1051818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. [Biochemical control as an alternative to fetal monitoring during expulsion stage of labor?]. Künzel W Gynakol Rundsch; 1985; 25 Suppl 2():65-80. PubMed ID: 4093019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Is fetal monitoring worthwhile? Br Med J; 1971 Mar; 1(5748):515-6. PubMed ID: 5547567 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. [Instrumental research in obstetrical monitoring. Analysis of the fetal cardiac rhythm by computers]. Sureau C; Chavinié J; Meziou ML; Sejean S; Le Houezec R Nouv Presse Med; 1972 Sep; 1(33):2174-6. PubMed ID: 5082249 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Clinical fetal monitoring. A survey of current usage. Paul RH; Hon EH Obstet Gynecol; 1971 May; 37(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 5091758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. [The interrelationship between the contractile activity of the uterus, its hemodynamics and the cardiac activity of the fetus in physiologic labor]. Syrovatko FA; Nesterova AA; Pilipenko NV Vopr Okhr Materin Det; 1972 Aug; 17(8):70-2. PubMed ID: 4642516 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Monitoring the mother and fetus during labor. Willis T Can Nurse; 1970 Dec; 66(12):28-31. PubMed ID: 5487053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Continuous fetal tissue pH monitoring in labor. Young BK; Katz M; Wilson SJ; Klein SA Prog Clin Biol Res; 1980; 44():123-32. PubMed ID: 7393929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]