These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 548856)

  • 21. Correlation between the optic disc and results obtained with conventional, high-pass resolution and pattern discrimination perimetry in glaucoma.
    Chauhan BC; LeBlanc RP; McCormick TA; Mohandas RN; Wijsman K
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1993 Dec; 28(7):312-6. PubMed ID: 8313216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Frequency-doubling threshold perimetry in predicting glaucoma in a population-based study: The Beijing Eye Study.
    Wang YX; Xu L; Zhang RX; Jonas JB
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 125(10):1402-6. PubMed ID: 17923550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Study of Optimal Perimetric Testing in Children (OPTIC): Feasibility, Reliability and Repeatability of Perimetry in Children.
    Patel DE; Cumberland PM; Walters BC; Russell-Eggitt I; Rahi JS;
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130895. PubMed ID: 26091102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Feasibility and outcome of automated kinetic perimetry in children.
    Wilscher S; Wabbels B; Lorenz B
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2010 Oct; 248(10):1493-500. PubMed ID: 20232076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Study of Optimal Perimetric Testing in Children (OPTIC): evaluation of kinetic approaches in childhood neuro-ophthalmic disease.
    Patel DE; Cumberland PM; Walters BC; Cortina-Borja M; Rahi JS;
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2019 Aug; 103(8):1085-1091. PubMed ID: 30232171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Peripheral visual field testing by automated kinetic perimetry in glaucoma.
    Stewart WC; Shields MB; Ollie AR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1988 Feb; 106(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 3341975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
    Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
    Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between Octopus 900 and Goldmann kinetic visual fields.
    Rowe FJ; Rowlands A
    Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():214829. PubMed ID: 24587983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual field assessment in glaucoma: comparative evaluation of manual kinetic Goldmann perimetry and automated static perimetry.
    Agarwal HC; Gulati V; Sihota R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2000 Dec; 48(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 11340889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pupillometer-based objective chromatic perimetry in normal eyes and patients with retinal photoreceptor dystrophies.
    Skaat A; Sher I; Kolker A; Elyasiv S; Rosenfeld E; Mhajna M; Melamed S; Belkin M; Rotenstreich Y
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Apr; 54(4):2761-70. PubMed ID: 23482470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Calibration of the Dicon Auto Perimeter 2000 compared with that of the Goldmann perimeter.
    Hart WM; Gordon MO
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1983 Dec; 96(6):744-50. PubMed ID: 6660263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Oculokinetic perimetry for the assessment of visual fields.
    Clark BJ; Timms C; Franks WA
    Arch Dis Child; 1990 Apr; 65(4):432-4. PubMed ID: 2346336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Learning effect in automatic static perimetry with Dicon TKS 4000 computed perimeter.
    Konareva-Kostianeva M; Atanassov M
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 1998; 40(3B Suppl 3):34-7. PubMed ID: 10205990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computerised perimetry with moving and steady fixation in children.
    Mutlukan E; Damato BE
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 4)():554-61. PubMed ID: 8253238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Physiologic statokinetic dissociation is eliminated by equating static and kinetic perimetry testing procedures.
    Phu J; Al-Saleem N; Kalloniatis M; Khuu SK
    J Vis; 2016 Nov; 16(14):5. PubMed ID: 27829104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Normal isopter position in the peripheral visual field in goldmann kinetic perimetry.
    Niederhauser S; Mojon DS
    Ophthalmologica; 2002; 216(6):406-8. PubMed ID: 12566882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of stimulus size on perimetric detection of small scotomata.
    Bek T; Lund-Andersen H
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1989; 227(6):531-4. PubMed ID: 2625209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The significance of static quantitative threshold perimetry and the barring of blind spot in kinetic quantitative perimetry in chronic open angle glaucoma].
    Ge JA
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1989 Mar; 25(2):70-4. PubMed ID: 2507255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Kinetic and static fixation methods in automated threshold perimetry.
    Asman P; Fingeret M; Robin A; Wild J; Pacey I; Greenfield D; Liebmann J; Ritch R
    J Glaucoma; 1999 Oct; 8(5):290-6. PubMed ID: 10529927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The limitations of kinetic perimetry in early scotoma detection.
    Portney GL; Krohn MA
    Ophthalmology; 1978 Mar; 85(3):287-93. PubMed ID: 662282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.