These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 548981)

  • 21. Increased binding of beta-2-microglobulin to blood cells in dialysis patients treated with high-flux dialyzers compared with low-flux membranes contributed to reduced beta-2-microglobulin concentrations. Results of a cross-over study.
    Traut M; Haufe CC; Eismann U; Deppisch RM; Stein G; Wolf G
    Blood Purif; 2007; 25(5-6):432-40. PubMed ID: 17957097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Kinetics of hemodiafiltration. I. In vitro transport characteristics of a hollow-fiber blood ultrafilter.
    Colton CK; Henderson LW; Ford CA; Lysaght MJ
    J Lab Clin Med; 1975 Mar; 85(3):355-71. PubMed ID: 1117205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ultrafiltration using the polysulfone membrane to reduce the cytokine-inducing activity of contaminated dialysate.
    Lonnemann G; Schindler R
    Clin Nephrol; 1994 Jul; 42 Suppl 1():S37-43. PubMed ID: 7923982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. High-flux synthetic versus cellulosic membranes for beta 2-microglobulin removal during hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration and hemofiltration.
    Floege J; Granolleras C; Deschodt G; Heck M; Baudin G; Branger B; Tournier O; Reinhard B; Eisenbach GM; Smeby LC
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 1989; 4(7):653-7. PubMed ID: 2510064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. beta 2-Microglobulin and other low molecular weight proteins in haemodiafiltrates and in haemofiltrates.
    Montali U; Pilone N; Cioni L; Ronca G
    Int J Tissue React; 1984; 6(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 6370888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Comparison of the permeation properties of experimental hemodialysis membranes made of cellulose acetate and the permeation properties of cellulose membranes].
    Schauer J; Labský J; Vacík J
    Cas Lek Cesk; 1984 Nov; 123(44):1345-8. PubMed ID: 6509483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Membrane characteristics, permeability parameters, and frictional coefficients for cuprophane.
    Fritzinger BK; Brauman SK; Lyman DJ
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1971 Jan; 5(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 5554095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Studies on the effect of humic acids and phenol on adsorption-ultrafiltration process performance.
    Mozia S; Tomaszewska M; Morawski AW
    Water Res; 2005; 39(2-3):501-9. PubMed ID: 15644259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Toxic metal ion separation by cellulose acetate/sulfonated poly(ether imide) blend membranes: effect of polymer composition and additive.
    Nagendran A; Vijayalakshmi A; Arockiasamy DL; Shobana KH; Mohan D
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Jul; 155(3):477-85. PubMed ID: 18191025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Rejection of solutes by hemodialysis/hemofiltration membranes.
    Holland FF; Klein E; Wendt RP; Eberle K
    Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs; 1978; 24():662-6. PubMed ID: 213869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Clinical dialysis: new problems and new prospects].
    Locatelli F; Manzoni C; Pozzoni P; Pontoriero G; Di Filippo L
    G Ital Nefrol; 2004; 21(2):156-64. PubMed ID: 15351950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Permeability of dialysis membranes for endotoxins. Clinical and experimental results].
    Passavanti G; Buongiorno E; De Fino G; Fumarola D; Coratelli P
    Cas Lek Cesk; 1990 Mar; 129(10):289-91. PubMed ID: 2340547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Solute transport across the peritoneal membrane.
    Leypoldt JK
    J Am Soc Nephrol; 2002 Jan; 13 Suppl 1():S84-91. PubMed ID: 11792767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Leucopenia, hypoxia and complement activation in haemodialysis. Three unrelated phenomena.
    de Vinuesa SG; Resano M; Luño J; Gonzalez C; Barril G; Junco E; Valderrabano F
    Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc; 1983; 19():159-67. PubMed ID: 6878230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Rejection of trace organic compounds by high-pressure membranes.
    Kim TU; Amy G; Drewes JE
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):335-44. PubMed ID: 16003994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In vitro evaluation of heparinized Cuprophan hemodialysis membranes.
    Hinrichs WL; ten Hoopen HW; Engbers GH; Feijen J
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1997 Jun; 35(4):443-50. PubMed ID: 9189822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Membranes and haemodialysis.
    Stephen RL; Zelman A; Scribner BH
    Proc Eur Dial Transplant Assoc; 1979; 16():286-94. PubMed ID: 398497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Haemodialysis membranes.
    Ronco C; Clark WR
    Nat Rev Nephrol; 2018 Jun; 14(6):394-410. PubMed ID: 29730670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The coupling of solute fluxes in membranes.
    Galey WR; Van Bruggen JT
    J Gen Physiol; 1970 Feb; 55(2):220-42. PubMed ID: 5413079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Structure and permeability of dialysis membranes sterilized by various methods.
    Sakai K
    J Biomater Appl; 1989 Oct; 4(2):71-101. PubMed ID: 2795440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.