These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [Quantitative studies on the auditory threshold, adaptation and sound perception in healthy subjects and in hearing disorders by means of "objective audiometry"]. Stange G; Soda T Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1968; 190(2):210-28. PubMed ID: 5758293 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Perstimulatory tracking in pitch perception by subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. Skinner P; Antinoro F J Speech Hear Res; 1970 Sep; 13(3):518-25. PubMed ID: 5507112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Directional audiometry. IV. The influence of azimuth on the perception of speech in aided and unaided patients with monaural hearing loss. Tonning FM Acta Otolaryngol; 1972 Jan; 73(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 5061256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Clinical and social aspects of speech audiometry. A comparative study of various speech audiometric materials]. Parving A; Barfod J; Salomon G Ugeskr Laeger; 1976 Jan; 138(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 1251486 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Directional audiometry. VI. Directional speech audiometry in patients with practical deafness in one ear and impaired hearing in the other ear treated with hearing aids. Tonning FM Acta Otolaryngol; 1972 Sep; 74(3):206-11. PubMed ID: 5080253 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Temporal masking: forward effects in normal and hypacusic subjects]. Salonna F; Quaranta A Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1972 May; 48(10):260-3. PubMed ID: 5070664 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Intergration of auditory signals in normal hearing and in hearing disorders]. Soucková S Cesk Otolaryngol; 1973 Oct; 22(5):267-70. PubMed ID: 4762466 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Interaural attenuation characteristics in audiometry. Snyder JM Laryngoscope; 1973 Nov; 83(11):1847-55. PubMed ID: 4758145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Presbyacusis. I. Comparison of manual and automatic thresholds. Jokinen K Acta Otolaryngol; 1969 Oct; 68(4):327-35. PubMed ID: 5373621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Shiver-audiometry in the conditioned guinea-pig (simplified Anderson-Wedenberg test). Crifò S Acta Otolaryngol; 1973 Jan; 75(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 4689027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Methods for assessing high frequency hearing loss in every-day listening situations. Aniansson G Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1974; 320():1-50. PubMed ID: 4532460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Subjective magnitude of auditory handicap in Thailand. Prasansuk S; Hinchcliffe R J Med Assoc Thai; 1978 Aug; 61(8):452-7. PubMed ID: 690534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Effect of central masking on behavior of auditory threshold values in normal persons and those with hypacusis]. Quaranta A; Salonna F Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1972 May; 48(10):256-9. PubMed ID: 5070663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]